Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added manual_buffer_allocation option #253

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 10, 2024

Conversation

francis-clairicia
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia added enhancement New feature or request topic-client Relative to client implementations topic-server Relative to server implementations labels Mar 10, 2024
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia self-assigned this Mar 10, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d8928d0) to head (c34f13e).

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
OS-Linux 83.60% <55.91%> (-0.42%) ⬇️
OS-Windows 83.55% <55.91%> (-0.45%) ⬇️
OS-macOS 83.60% <55.91%> (-0.42%) ⬇️
Py-3.11 99.88% <98.92%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.12 99.91% <98.92%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
test-functional 83.99% <55.91%> (-0.46%) ⬇️
test-unit 88.08% <97.84%> (+0.81%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia merged commit 9499def into main Mar 10, 2024
19 checks passed
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia deleted the feature/manual-buffer-allocation-option branch March 10, 2024 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request topic-client Relative to client implementations topic-server Relative to server implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant