Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optional async-backend interface #279

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 25, 2024

Conversation

francis-clairicia
Copy link
Owner

What's changed (since #262)

The backend parameter is now optional for the following classes:

  • easynetwork.clients.AsyncTCPNetworkClient
  • easynetwork.clients.AsyncUDPNetworkClient
  • easynetwork.servers.AsyncTCPNetworkServer
  • easynetwork.servers.AsyncUDPNetworkServer
  • easynetwork.lowlevel.futures.AsyncExecutor

@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia added enhancement New feature or request topic-async Relative to asynchronous API labels Apr 25, 2024
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia self-assigned this Apr 25, 2024
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia added topic-client Relative to client implementations topic-server Relative to server implementations labels Apr 25, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (733adfd) to head (f9e997c).

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
OS-Linux 99.86% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
OS-Windows 99.76% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
OS-macOS 99.86% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.11 99.83% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
Py-3.12 99.73% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
test-functional 84.02% <76.47%> (+0.08%) ⬆️
test-unit 88.54% <98.03%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia merged commit 2c89efa into main Apr 25, 2024
21 checks passed
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia deleted the feature/async-backend/optional-backend-param branch April 25, 2024 10:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request topic-async Relative to asynchronous API topic-client Relative to client implementations topic-server Relative to server implementations
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant