Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented trio backend #337

Merged
merged 45 commits into from
Aug 3, 2024
Merged

Implemented trio backend #337

merged 45 commits into from
Aug 3, 2024

Conversation

francis-clairicia
Copy link
Owner

What's changed

  • Added trio implementation of AsyncBackend interface
  • Added AsyncBackend.gather() method (not abstract)
  • Added AsyncBackend.getaddrinfo() and AsyncBackend.getnameinfo()
    • By default, simply call the functions in socket module within a thread.

@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia added enhancement New feature or request topic-async Relative to asynchronous API labels Aug 3, 2024
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia self-assigned this Aug 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (94f5e72) to head (8e7bfef).
Report is 52 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
Flag Coverage Δ
OS-Linux 99.88% <99.78%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
OS-Windows 99.78% <99.78%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
OS-macOS 99.88% <99.78%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
Py-3.11 99.89% <99.78%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Py-3.12 99.92% <99.78%> (-0.03%) ⬇️
test-functional 82.76% <88.91%> (+0.90%) ⬆️
test-unit 89.35% <84.23%> (-0.37%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia merged commit fa15bff into main Aug 3, 2024
22 checks passed
@francis-clairicia francis-clairicia deleted the feature/trio-backend branch August 3, 2024 21:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request topic-async Relative to asynchronous API
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant