Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: warn about macOS 15 compatibility #628

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2025
Merged

Conversation

cfm
Copy link
Member

@cfm cfm commented Jan 14, 2025

Status

Ready for review

Description of Changes

Documents workaround for #599.

Testing

I welcome feedback on this language.

Release

Checklist (Optional)

  • Doc linting (make docs-lint) passed locally
  • Doc link linting (make docs-linkcheck) passed
  • You have previewed (make docs) docs at http://localhost:8000

@cfm cfm force-pushed the 599-veracrypt-macos-15 branch from 9c48ab5 to 96d8afc Compare January 14, 2025 20:57
@cfm cfm marked this pull request as ready for review January 14, 2025 21:01
@nathandyer nathandyer self-assigned this Jan 14, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@nathandyer nathandyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One very nitpicky language question aside, this looks great. Once we decide on that tweak I'm happy to approve and merge.

Copy link
Contributor

@nathandyer nathandyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @cfm, this new language is excellent. Approving and merging.

@nathandyer nathandyer added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 15, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 9080856 Jan 15, 2025
4 checks passed
@nathandyer nathandyer deleted the 599-veracrypt-macos-15 branch January 15, 2025 21:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants