You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It appears that the "type of connection" (the [p[t style notation) is mislabeled for many of the BNDs called. I have attached an excel file with an example for each of the 4 types of connections. I have also attached screenshots showing the reads spanning the breakpoints. Finally, I'm attaching drawings of the expected and actual type of connection (the second one I believe is correct, but the other three do not match). The "expected" is the type of connection that I expected based on the label from sniffles. The "actual" type of connection is what I am seeing from the reads spanning the breakpoints. I got the definitions for the types of connections from the documentation of VCF format here. Of note, their figure 2 images match my interpretation of the type of connection.
It appears that the "type of connection" (the [p[t style notation) is mislabeled for many of the BNDs called. I have attached an excel file with an example for each of the 4 types of connections. I have also attached screenshots showing the reads spanning the breakpoints. Finally, I'm attaching drawings of the expected and actual type of connection (the second one I believe is correct, but the other three do not match). The "expected" is the type of connection that I expected based on the label from sniffles. The "actual" type of connection is what I am seeing from the reads spanning the breakpoints. I got the definitions for the types of connections from the documentation of VCF format here. Of note, their figure 2 images match my interpretation of the type of connection.
bnd_examples.xlsx
bnd_expected_actual.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: