Use new [Option|ValueOption|Result|Choice].Sequence in Traverse #565
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
fcallejon
changed the title
fcallejon
force-pushed
the
fer-use_new_sequence_in_traverse
branch
10 times, most recently
from
b0b70a8 to
fd2bd8e
Compare
fcallejon
force-pushed
the
fer-use_new_sequence_in_traverse
branch
from
fd2bd8e to
a5aee9a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Use specific
Sequencefor equalTraverseinstead of the generic one.Fix issue in
ValueOption.SequenceandOption.Sequence