Change style of base constructor calls. #2555
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Am I right in thinking this doesn't affect |
|
Yup, object expressions are not affected by this. |
nojaf
force-pushed
the
inherit-constructors
branch
from
8c6c9e7 to
27e1aa9
Compare
nojaf
force-pushed
the
inherit-constructors
branch
from
27e1aa9 to
373d086
Compare
nojaf
force-pushed
the
inherit-constructors
branch
from
373d086 to
82c020d
Compare
nojaf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2022
* Change style of base constructor calls. * Add changelog entry for 5.1.0-alpha-005.
nojaf
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2022
* Change style of base constructor calls. * Add changelog entry for 5.1.0-alpha-005.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Update according to the guidance of fsharp/fslang-design#693.
Fixes fsharp/fslang-design#693.
Fixes #2111
Fixes #2335
@Smaug123 there is a minor impact for MultilineBlockBracketsOnSameColumn.
I don't think you really use that much. Nevertheless, does it seem acceptable?