-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 185
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NF: All shape actor based on primitive #967
base: v2
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @ManishReddyR,
- Can you rebase this PR on the top of the v2 branch (it avoids to see 15 commits)
- Can you do all of them in one PR? update this PR with all shape actor based on primitive. easy to review. I think it would be better than one by one. in this specific case.
thank you
I see you requested a review @ManishReddyR. Thank you for the update. What about superquadric, rectangle, arrow, cone, triangularprism, rhombicuboctahedron, pentagonalprism, octagonalprism, tetrahedron, icosahedron, star? |
keep doing 1 commit per primitives shape, this is great and easier to review. Thanks |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See my comment above, many shapes are missing.
Otherwise, it looks good as it is now
working on it, will complete all of them by end of this weekend. And will update you. |
…ombicuboctahedron.
Hello @skoudoro , Can you review the actors, which I have added. Thank you |
Hi @ManishReddyR, I will look at this on Friday. Thank you for working on this. Can you update your tests ? they seems repetitive. Look here for an example on how you could refactor all of this: fury/fury/tests/test_primitive.py Lines 9 to 25 in 337f4b3
|
Hi @ManishReddyR Thank you for the work. @skoudoro should we use only npt for the assertions? I see we have used mixture of |
it is fine, as soon as they are explicit enough. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall, it is good,
see the comment below to update. Waiting for the tests refactorization also. Thank @ManishReddyR
Hello @skoudoro , |
Hello,
Tried create the actor for Tetrahedron and also added few of the uni tests cases.
Thank You
Manish Rakasi