Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved runtime of color bleeding from O(n^2) to O(n) #4

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

letmaik
Copy link

@letmaik letmaik commented Aug 2, 2013

The speedup brings the runtime down from several minutes to a few seconds.

Instead of starting over in each iteration an efficient breadth-first search is done. Initially, only those fully transparent pixels are added to "pending" that have at least one neighbor which is not a fully transparent pixel. This is called the "border". This border is then subsequently extended/shifted in each iteration such that only relevant pixels are considered. In the old algorithm pixels that had only fully transparent neighbors were considered again and again in each iteration until the border finally reached those pixels.

Another optimization was done related to reading/writing the rgb array of BufferedImage.

letmaik added 3 commits August 2, 2013 19:08
The speedup brings the runtime down from several minutes to a few seconds.

Instead of starting over in each iteration an efficient breadth-first search is done. Initially, only those fully transparent pixels are added to "pending" that have at least one neighbor which is not a fully transparent pixel. This is called the "border". This border is then subsequently extended/shifted in each iteration such that only relevant pixels are considered. In the old algorithm pixels that had only fully transparent neighbors were considered again and again in each iteration until the border finally reached those pixels.

Another optimization was done related to reading/writing the rgb array of BufferedImage.
When a fully transparent pixel only has fully transparent pixels around it, then this information is saved into a boolean and reused for the following pixel. This allows to reduce the number of lookups of bordering pixels to 3 (the 3 right ones) instead of all 8.

On my machine around 100ms got saved with this method for a texture that had a lot of fully transparent pixels.
The iteration only loops pixels which have at least one non-fully-transparent pixel.
@letmaik
Copy link
Author

letmaik commented Jan 29, 2015

It's been a long time. I want to remove my own fork. Will you merge the changes or not?

@letmaik
Copy link
Author

letmaik commented Apr 10, 2016

Ping

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant