-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add address and postal code to user entity #2
Conversation
Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables/Secrets for this repo. you could follow readme for more information |
private String address; | ||
|
||
@Column(unique = true) | ||
private String postalCode; | ||
|
||
@ManyToMany(fetch = FetchType.EAGER, cascade = CascadeType.ALL) | ||
@JoinTable(name = "users_roles", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review:
Bug risks:
- Potentially missing nullability check for
address
field as it does not have thenullable = false
attribute specified. - The
postalCode
field is marked as unique, but postal codes are not always unique and may lead to constraint violations if not enforced properly.
Improvement suggestions:
- Consider adding validation annotations like
@NotBlank
or custom validations to ensure data integrity for fields likename
,username
,email
,password
, and potentiallyaddress
. - Documenting fields and methods in the code for better readability and maintainability.
- Add appropriate indexes on columns based on their usage in queries to optimize database performance.
- Use more specific fetch strategies other than
FetchType.EAGER
if possible to avoid potential performance issues when loading entities. - Handle potential exceptions that might occur during database operations to improve error handling and maintain reliability.
- Consider refactoring code into smaller, more manageable classes if the User class becomes too large or complex.
Remember that further specific optimizations or improvements would depend on the context of how this class is being used within the application.
WalkthroughThe changes introduced in this pull request primarily focus on expanding the data model of our application. New fields have been added to the Changes
Uplevel your code reviews with CodeRabbit ProCodeRabbit ProIf you like this project, please support us by purchasing the Pro version. The Pro version has advanced context, superior noise reduction and several proprietary improvements compared to the open source version. Moreover, CodeRabbit Pro is free for open source projects. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Files selected (2)
- src/main/java/com/springboot/blog/entity/Category.java (1)
- src/main/java/com/springboot/blog/entity/User.java (2)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/main/java/com/springboot/blog/entity/Category.java
Review comments generated (2)
- Review: 2
- LGTM: 0
Tips
Chat with CodeRabbit Bot (@coderabbitai
)
- Reply on review comments left by this bot to ask follow-up questions. A review comment is a comment on a diff or a file.
- Invite the bot into a review comment chain by tagging
@coderabbitai
in a reply.
Code suggestions
- The bot may make code suggestions, but please review them carefully before committing since the line number ranges may be misaligned.
- You can edit the comment made by the bot and manually tweak the suggestion if it is slightly off.
Pausing incremental reviews
- Add
@coderabbitai: ignore
anywhere in the PR description to pause further reviews from the bot.
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ | |||
import lombok.NoArgsConstructor; | |||
import lombok.Setter; | |||
|
|||
import java.util.Date; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The import statement for java.util.Date
has been added. However, it's recommended to use java.time.LocalDate
or java.time.LocalDateTime
instead of java.util.Date
for date-time manipulation in modern Java applications. The newer classes provide a more comprehensive and user-friendly operation set.
- import java.util.Date;
+ import java.time.LocalDate;
private String address; | ||
|
||
@Column(unique = true) | ||
private String postalCode; | ||
|
||
private Date birthDate; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
New fields address
, postalCode
, and birthDate
have been added to the User
entity. However, there are no constraints on these fields. Consider adding appropriate constraints such as @Column(nullable = false)
if these fields are mandatory. Also, making postalCode
unique might not be suitable because multiple users can live in the same postal code area.
- private String address;
+ @Column(nullable = false)
+ private String address;
- @Column(unique = true)
- private String postalCode;
+ private String postalCode;
- private Date birthDate;
+ private LocalDate birthDate;
@coderabbitai: What is done in this pull request ? |
🥷 Code experts: no user matched threshold 10 See details
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Knowledge based on git-blame:
Knowledge based on git-blame: To learn more about /:\ gitStream - Visit our Docs |
https://moneyforwardvietnam.atlassian.net/browse/SCI-1112
How to check
Checklist
unit-test
self-review
andtest
of my codeperf issue
new properties
? If then you need to create propertieson:
task_definition_app.json
,task_definition_app_beta.json
andAWS paramStore
STG/PROD
plz prepareliquibase script
Summary by CodeRabbit
User
entity. Users can now provide their address, postal code, and birth date for a more personalized experience.slug
field to theCategory
entity. This will enhance category identification and searchability across the platform.