chore: delete unneeded custom codeql GitHub Action #70
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
We do not have any custom CodeQL jobs, so we are going back to the default CodeQL setup. [New default CodeQL setup is already running successfully](https://github.com/github/automatic-contrib-prs/actions/workflows/github-code-scanning/codeql)
jmeridth
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 28, 2024
- [x] auto-labeler action - [x] release action - [x] fix codeql bade in README (after we removed custom workflow in #70) Signed-off-by: jmeridth <[email protected]>
7 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request
Proposed Changes
We do not have any custom CodeQL jobs, so we are going back to the default CodeQL setup.
New default CodeQL setup is already running successfully
Readiness Checklist
Author/Contributor
make lintand fix any issues that you have introducedmake testand ensure you have test coverage for the lines you are introducingReviewer
bug,documentation,enhancement,infrastructure,maintenanceorbreaking