Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regularise extractor pack licenses to all cite the MIT license that covers the whole CodeQL repository #18829

Merged

Conversation

smowton
Copy link
Contributor

@smowton smowton commented Feb 20, 2025

Previously some extractors did and some didn't provide an explicit license alongside the codeql-extractor.yml, though those that did all used the MIT license.

@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings February 20, 2025 18:56
@smowton smowton requested review from a team as code owners February 20, 2025 18:56

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Overview

This PR standardizes the license declaration for the JavaScript extractor to use the MIT License throughout the repository.

  • Updates license text in the extractor README from Apache License 2.0 to MIT License.
  • Aligns the license link to point to the MIT License file on the CodeQL repository.

Reviewed Changes

File Description
javascript/extractor/README.md Changed license information from Apache License 2.0 to MIT License with an updated link

Copilot reviewed 6 out of 6 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Tip: If you use Visual Studio Code, you can request a review from Copilot before you push from the "Source Control" tab. Learn more

adityasharad
adityasharad previously approved these changes Feb 20, 2025
@smowton smowton merged commit 311c1e1 into github:main Feb 20, 2025
29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants