Added autoprint feature #52
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This is so freaking useful and works like a champ. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, I might have a solution to issue #44. The proposal parses the cell content with the system installed python, surrounds the last syntax node with a print call if it is an expression and deparses the abstract syntax tree again.
So far it seems to work fine. The only issue I can think of is when the cell content is parsable for the micropython interpreter but not for the system installed version of python. For standard cpython the only difference in that direction I could find was here. I don't understand why, but it still worked with my installed python interpreter (3.9.9)
Let me know what you think!