-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unable to call LoggingApi.entries.tail() #407
Comments
Exactly. We cannot do streaming APIs |
Thanks for confirming! I guess this function should also be removed from discovery at some point. |
sorry. my accounts got mixed up, that was me, the previous post |
@kevmoo is there any roadmap for If that's not something that is planned or will be worked on, it's worth dropping the method from the public API. |
It also seems that even if the underlying request wasn't returning error, streaming wouldn't be possible still, since |
I'm downstream of things that need to be fixed. I'd happy accept a pull request excluding these APIs. |
I went through the steps described under contributing section of the readme and it's not entirely clear to me if there is some "exclusion" mechanism. If I just remove the |
You have to add a |
I can't find any notes on how to name those diffs. Should those just be unique or is there any relation to commit shas? |
The names don't matter. They just have to be valid diff files. The
convention is to align the diff with the corresponding issues. In this case
`i407.diff`
…On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 12:02 PM Andrei Lesnitsky ***@***.***> wrote:
I can't find any notes on how to name those diffs. Should those just be
unique or is there any relation to commit shas?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#407 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAEFCU3GGNIJ7BGWMAHKPTYWYQE7AVCNFSM5WMGOCT2U5DIOJSWCZC7NNSXTN2JONZXKZKDN5WW2ZLOOQ5TCOJXHE2TGNJSHA4A>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I've also tried calling the API directly with a raw HttpClient and got the same error response. Could a relevant issue be raised internally? |
When I try to use the tail function provided in the Logging API, I am getting the following error
[{ "error": { "code": 400, "message": "Invalid value (Object), ", "status": "INVALID_ARGUMENT", "details": [ { "@type": "type.googleapis.com/google.rpc.BadRequest", "fieldViolations": [ { "description": "Invalid value (Object), " } ] } ] } } ]
I stumbled across this issue and I am assuming this is a similar bug. Can you confirm? And are there plans to use the gRPC versions to enable streaming into flutter?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: