Skip to content

Add an interactive debug mode to protypyter, that accepts user input to prompt #1129

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

wenta0g
Copy link

@wenta0g wenta0g commented Jun 20, 2025

This PR add a --interactive_debug flag that accepts user input to prompt. It is triggered when LLM's latest response fails to produce a valid fuzz target, after the initial prototyper prompt.
Usage:
./run_all_experiments.py --model=vertex_ai_gemini-1-5-chat -y ./benchmark-sets/comparison/igraph.yaml --agent --interactive_debug

This option can be used for prompt design and experiment, which is preferred to run independently from OSS-Fuzz-Gen's large-scale experiment. When the interactive mode is activated, the user can type in a prompt message from the terminal, following display like:

You may now enter a custom prompt for the LLM.
When finished:
Press Enter, then Ctrl+D (Linux/macOS)

The custom prompt is then wrapped into a prompt template to give more context to LLM

Copy link

google-cla bot commented Jun 20, 2025

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@wenta0g wenta0g changed the title Debug Add an interactive debug mode to protypyter, that accepts user input to prompt Jun 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants