Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tempo-distributed] add persistentVolumeClaimRetentionPolicy for ingester #3419

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

pohldk
Copy link

@pohldk pohldk commented Nov 11, 2024

This was added to Loki distributed chart but would be useful for tempo distributed chart as well.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 11, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@pohldk pohldk changed the title add persistentVolumeClaimRetentionPolicy for tempo ingester [tempo-distributed] add persistentVolumeClaimRetentionPolicy for ingester Nov 11, 2024
Co-authored-by: Joseph Petersen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Pohl <[email protected]>
@Sheikh-Abubaker
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @pohldk, could you please bump the chart version to 1.23.0 in order to fix the CI lint test.

Signed-off-by: Michael Pohl <[email protected]>
@pohldk
Copy link
Author

pohldk commented Nov 15, 2024

@Sheikh-Abubaker
done 👍

@jkroepke
Copy link
Collaborator

Please create a distinct PR for each chart.

The CI and approval process is not designed for PR over multiple charts.

@jkroepke jkroepke closed this Nov 15, 2024
@pohldk
Copy link
Author

pohldk commented Nov 15, 2024

Please reopen, clearly a mistake @jkroepke we simply need to only run helmdocs on tempo. My bad.

@pohldk
Copy link
Author

pohldk commented Nov 15, 2024

@jkroepke if you reopen you it should update the PR with the corrected commit on the branch:

bb63dd6

@jkroepke
Copy link
Collaborator

It seems like you do a force-push with prevents a reopen.

image

Please create a new PR, thanks!

@pohldk
Copy link
Author

pohldk commented Nov 15, 2024

@jkroepke #3429 done

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants