Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Basic support of jax.lax.scatter operations in TessellateIPU. #24

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 25, 2023

Conversation

balancap
Copy link
Contributor

@balancap balancap commented Sep 22, 2023

TessellateIPU scatter integration using popops popops::MultiUpdateXXX<> vertices.

At the moment, it only supports the most basic scatter configuration:

ScatterDimensionNumbers(
    update_window_dims=(), inserted_window_dims=(0,), scatter_dims_to_operand_dims=(0,)
)

@balancap balancap force-pushed the basic-support-scatter-in-tessellate branch 2 times, most recently from e3a27c9 to 37a1d38 Compare September 25, 2023 16:24
@balancap balancap changed the title Basic support scatter in tessellate Basic support of jax.lax.scatter operations in TessellateIPU. Sep 25, 2023
@balancap balancap force-pushed the basic-support-scatter-in-tessellate branch 2 times, most recently from a931f57 to 821752b Compare September 25, 2023 19:00
TessellateIPU `scatter` integration using popops `popops::MultiUpdateXXX<>` vertices.

At the moment, it only supports the most basic scatter configuration:
```python
ScatterDimensionNumbers(
    update_window_dims=(), inserted_window_dims=(0,), scatter_dims_to_operand_dims=(0,)
)
```
@balancap balancap force-pushed the basic-support-scatter-in-tessellate branch from 821752b to 2a69f4d Compare September 25, 2023 19:07
@balancap balancap merged commit 49dea55 into main Sep 25, 2023
6 checks passed
@balancap balancap deleted the basic-support-scatter-in-tessellate branch September 25, 2023 19:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant