gcgs-gppa-custom-query-builder-args.php: Added instruction video and scoping to specific field-form IDs.
#1048
Conversation
…d scoping to specific field-form IDs.
…d scoping to specific field-form IDs.
WalkthroughThe changes update the anonymous function attached to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Filter as gcgs_gppa_query_builder_args Filter
participant Func as Query Builder Function
participant Field as $field Object
Filter->>Func: Trigger query builder callback
Func->>Field: Instantiate $field object
alt Conditions not met:
note right of Func: ($field->id ≠ '4' or $field->formId ≠ 141 or operator ≠ 'is')
Func-->>Filter: Return original query_builder_args
else Conditions met:
note right of Func: Conditions satisfied for further processing
Func-->>Filter: Proceed with modified query_builder_args
end
Suggested reviewers
Tip ⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
gc-google-sheets/gcgs-gppa-custom-query-builder-args.php (1)
29-30: Consider alternatives to extract()While the code acknowledges the use of
extract()with a PHPCS ignore comment, it's generally considered a risky practice that can lead to variable collisions and make debugging difficult.Consider refactoring to explicitly access array elements instead:
- // phpcs:ignore WordPress.PHP.DontExtract.extract_extract - extract( $args ); + $filter_value = $args['filter_value'] ?? null; + $filter = $args['filter'] ?? null; + $filter_group_index = $args['filter_group_index'] ?? null; + $property_id = $args['property_id'] ?? null; + $field = $args['field'] ?? null;This makes the code more explicit about which variables are being used from
$argsand adds null coalescing for safety.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
gc-google-sheets/gcgs-gppa-custom-query-builder-args.php(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
gc-google-sheets/gcgs-gppa-custom-query-builder-args.php (3)
5-5: Helpful documentation addition!Adding an instruction video link improves user experience by providing visual guidance on how to use this snippet.
26-28: LGTM: Variable declarationThe variable declaration with proper PHPDoc type annotation is a good practice.
40-51: Logic verification needed for filter value processingThe condition at line 40 checks if
$filter_valueis not empty before processing, but there's no corresponding validation that$filter_valueis actually an array before using it in the foreach loop.Consider adding a type check:
- if ( ! empty( $filter_value ) ) { + if ( ! empty( $filter_value ) && is_array( $filter_value ) ) {This would prevent PHP warnings if
$filter_valueis unexpectedly a non-array value.
| // TODO : UPDATE 4 to your targetted field ID. | ||
| // TODO : UPDATE 141 to your targetted form ID. | ||
| if ( $field->id != '4' || $field->formId != 141 || $filter['operator'] != 'is' ) { | ||
| return $query_builder_args; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding null checks and making the targeting configurable
The current implementation has a few potential issues:
- There's no null check for
$fieldbefore accessing its properties, which could cause PHP warnings - There's no check if
$filter['operator']exists - The field ID is compared as a string ('4') while form ID as an integer (141)
- // TODO : UPDATE 4 to your targetted field ID.
- // TODO : UPDATE 141 to your targetted form ID.
- if ( $field->id != '4' || $field->formId != 141 || $filter['operator'] != 'is' ) {
+ // Define your target field and form IDs
+ $target_field_id = '4'; // Field ID to target
+ $target_form_id = 141; // Form ID to target
+
+ // Skip processing if not matching our targeted field/form or if required variables aren't set
+ if ( !isset($field) || !is_object($field) ||
+ $field->id != $target_field_id ||
+ $field->formId != $target_form_id ||
+ !isset($filter['operator']) ||
+ $filter['operator'] != 'is' ) {This change improves:
- Safety by adding null checks
- Maintainability by moving hardcoded values to variables at the top
- Consistency in how we handle the comparison
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // TODO : UPDATE 4 to your targetted field ID. | |
| // TODO : UPDATE 141 to your targetted form ID. | |
| if ( $field->id != '4' || $field->formId != 141 || $filter['operator'] != 'is' ) { | |
| return $query_builder_args; | |
| } | |
| // Define your target field and form IDs | |
| $target_field_id = '4'; // Field ID to target | |
| $target_form_id = 141; // Form ID to target | |
| // Skip processing if not matching our targeted field/form or if required variables aren't set | |
| if ( !isset($field) || !is_object($field) || | |
| $field->id != $target_field_id || | |
| $field->formId != $target_form_id || | |
| !isset($filter['operator']) || | |
| $filter['operator'] != 'is' ) { | |
| return $query_builder_args; | |
| } |
Context
⛑️ Ticket(s): https://secure.helpscout.net/conversation/2850980281/78195
Summary
Added instruction video, also scoping it to specific form/field ID.