This repository contains supplemental material to enable replication of our study as submitted to the artifact evaluation for USENIX Security 2023. These include:
- The complete survey presented to participants as both QSF and .txt files
- Codebooks used for qualitative analysis of free-text responses
- Qualitative coding worksheets with a breakdown of IRR values from each round of coding, and Scripts for computing IRR
- Analysis scripts used to process data including:
- R scripts for data processing
- input data files in csv format
- All generated figures included in the paper
- A PDF of the paper itself
- Survey-Instruments: The survey as presented to participants as Qualtrics export (QSF) and as a .txt document.
- QSF-survey-file(s)
- TXT-survey-file(s)
- Scripts
- Quantitative_analysis: Scripts used for both initial processing of quantitative data, and for exploratory analysis
- R_script_files including 2021-educator.Rmd
- Qualitative_analysis: Scripts for assessing qualitative analysis
- irr.py Script to calculate inter-rater reliablility (Cohen's Kappa)
- runirr.sh Script that will run the irr.py program on all primary and secondary coding files
- Quantitative_analysis: Scripts used for both initial processing of quantitative data, and for exploratory analysis
- Data
- Quantitative_data
- Likert_response_data_files
- *Qualitative_data
- Free_text_response_files
- Qualitative_codebok_files
- Quantitative_data
- Figures
- Rendered_figure_files
- Table_files (R script outputs and .tex files)
- PDFs
- USENIX-paper-pdf
- Arxiv-paper-pdf
David G. Balash, Rahel A. Fainchtein, Elena Korkes, Miles Grant, Micah Sherr, and Adam J. Aviv. “Educators’ Perspectives of Using (or Not Using) Online Exam Proctoring”. Proceedings of the 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX 2023).
(Extended version avaialble on arXiv)