Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create Detailed/In-depth video for users #866

Open
2 of 12 tasks
VJ1285 opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 15 comments
Open
2 of 12 tasks

Create Detailed/In-depth video for users #866

VJ1285 opened this issue Jul 17, 2021 · 15 comments
Labels
Dependency Issues that cannot be worked on until another issue is closed epic: UX R1 feature improvement Issues that were created to address feedback from our first user testing will LADOT and LACP users level: hard p-feature: Project Page p1 Users Define Project including AIN, Adress, Ect. /calculation/1 pbv: pm All issues of product management priority: SHOULD HAVE role: Product Management size: missing

Comments

@VJ1285
Copy link
Member

VJ1285 commented Jul 17, 2021

Dependency

Overview

We need to add a detailed/in-depth video that helps the user understand how to navigate the web pages and also how to access tooltips.

Action Items

  • Define ideal length of video
  • Define what features and functions of the app will be covered in the video
  • Define where the tags will go (so that the video can play on specific pages the user is on by the time stamp).
  • LADOT to review script
  • Make an in-depth/detailed video
  • Add tags to the video
  • review with stakeholder
@ExperimentsInHonesty
Copy link
Member

David said that they anticipate significant changes to the strategies based on the feedback they are getting. So we will hold off on this video until we get the changes.

@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty added the Dependency Issues that cannot be worked on until another issue is closed label Jul 31, 2021
@dddhoang dddhoang added p-feature: Project Page p1 Users Define Project including AIN, Adress, Ect. /calculation/1 and removed feature: missing labels Oct 6, 2021
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty added the epic: UX R1 feature improvement Issues that were created to address feedback from our first user testing will LADOT and LACP users label Oct 23, 2021
@SMR9220 SMR9220 added p-Feature Project Page 1 and removed p-feature: Project Page p1 Users Define Project including AIN, Adress, Ect. /calculation/1 labels Jul 18, 2022
@ExperimentsInHonesty ExperimentsInHonesty added Dependency Issues that cannot be worked on until another issue is closed and removed Dependency Issues that cannot be worked on until another issue is closed labels Aug 10, 2022
@ExperimentsInHonesty

This comment was marked as outdated.

@ExperimentsInHonesty
Copy link
Member

ExperimentsInHonesty commented Nov 5, 2022

At one point we thought the video would address these issues. We hope that we have addressed these issue in the app itself. But its a good list to reference when making a script for the video.

Notes

The video should be able to address the below issues from the usability testing
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SEd8uPOwOmEMdsDR_pylZ2tiByopzPrmlqB5Y4Ka4xc/edit?usp=sharing

  • Bonus package information is confusing, not sure what it applies to and how it fits into the flow of everything.
  • Users were unsure of what to do at this step as it is informative rather actionable.
  • People do not know there is a tool tip for every single row on this page. They are missing the disclaimer at the very top of the page.
  • Bonus package information is lost and hard to find
  • People are not quite sure what the point of this page is. Not sure that one can use this page to see the different options they may take to meet the TDM requirements.
  • General confusion on what information is actually required (e.g., how much detail is needed for project description).
  • Users are confused about what to do with the information presented on this page.
  • User is unsure where these numbers came from, especially the Target Points.
  • Tooltip information is lengthy and confusing
  • Users unclear what to do if they did not succeed, as this is not displayed

@pmeda12
Copy link
Member

pmeda12 commented Feb 16, 2023

Here are some thoughts I have on length, content, and placement.

Length:
-This video should not be very long if its purpose is to explain tooltip visibility and function

  • Few seconds max since there are 2 types of tooltips (hover over, and clickable)

Content:
-Check common areas of difficulty in tooltip visibility
-Research study where we ask one group to go thru the site and another to go thru site with the video

Location:
-A/B test design preferences in which we show users images of the site with varying placements of the video.

@Jane4925
Copy link
Member

Jane4925 commented Feb 16, 2023

Clarifying question: are we aiming to 1) have a whole run down video that walk through a test case project and tour the site, or 2) short videos that focus on particular pain points - a video version of FAQ page (I think that the FAQ page covered everything that i can think of at the moment)?

@mojimoh
Copy link
Member

mojimoh commented Mar 2, 2023

@Jane4925 @pmeda12 The intent of the video is to have a complete run through of the site features using a test case to tour the site.

@Jane4925
Copy link
Member

@pmeda12 will start making a rough draft for outline

@pmeda12
Copy link
Member

pmeda12 commented Mar 23, 2023

-Checklist
-Explanation of visual design
--When hovering over clickable item, it changes visually from x to y
-How to use the following functions:
--Reset page / reset project
--Top menu bar
--Save project
-Pain points to clarify
--Purpose of bonus package
--How strategy selection factors into sidebar

@pmeda12
Copy link
Member

pmeda12 commented Mar 23, 2023

@pmeda12
Copy link
Member

pmeda12 commented Mar 24, 2023

@Biuwa https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fu1RidWoyNoHK_2HR4dapVPAEQvKB_fB0BiGTvz_Lks/edit

Here is the link to the checklist with some updates.

@ExperimentsInHonesty
Copy link
Member

Moving up to Priority: Should Have because of the problem with users not seeing tooltips even though we have tried

  • bolding on hover
  • changing color on hover
  • adding a box on page 1 that explains how to get more information

@Jane4925
Copy link
Member

Per notes from [04/05/2023 team meeting] (#1311 (comment)), here are some current thoughts and questions:

  • "Where would this video be viewable?": thinking that Youtube is a suitable media if LADOT has an official channel and agrees to create a designated playlist. We can also link the tutorial videos on the TDM Calculator site under the FAQ page or inside specific tooltip or page.
  • "break it down, so it's easy to implement": can we be a bit more specific on how to further break it down?

@Jane4925
Copy link
Member

Jane4925 commented Apr 15, 2023

If we still want to do a complete run-down tutorial video using test cases, then Youtube might be the most suitable media. We can set up the "chapter" inside the complete video, or have a playlist including shorter videos breaking down very page.

If we want to do short video clips, we can still post on the Youtube and link/embed those videos on the FAQ page along side the specific question, or inside tooltips, or somewhere on each page within TDM Calculator site. If we don't want to post the short video clips on Youtube, I don't know how feasible it is to embed them on the website... probably a question for Dev team.

A question though, when do we expect making videos need to get started?

@Biuwa
Copy link
Member

Biuwa commented Apr 29, 2023

This issue is in ice box until we finish implementing solutions for the tooltips

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Dependency Issues that cannot be worked on until another issue is closed epic: UX R1 feature improvement Issues that were created to address feedback from our first user testing will LADOT and LACP users level: hard p-feature: Project Page p1 Users Define Project including AIN, Adress, Ect. /calculation/1 pbv: pm All issues of product management priority: SHOULD HAVE role: Product Management size: missing
Projects
Status: Ice Box
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants