Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for PublishBlockStream to simulator #430

Closed
Tracked by #308
jsync-swirlds opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #548
Closed
Tracked by #308

Add support for PublishBlockStream to simulator #430

jsync-swirlds opened this issue Dec 19, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #548
Assignees
Labels
Simulator Issue related to Block Stream Simulator

Comments

@jsync-swirlds
Copy link
Member

jsync-swirlds commented Dec 19, 2024

As a Consensus Node Engineer
I want to use the Block Node Simulator to test my Consensus Node
So That I can continuously validate the communication protocol is correct.

Notes

Teams working on the Consensus Node software have asked if the simulator can be used to simulate a Block Node for use in testing the Consensus Node. This is a good idea, and we should ensure that they can do so. We know there is already a small disconnect in protocol due to differences in the protobuf definitions (partly caused by having 3 different "authoritative" sources, plus semi-authoritative sources), and using the block node simulator could help ensure those issues are caught and handled early.

@georgi-l95 georgi-l95 self-assigned this Jan 13, 2025
@georgi-l95 georgi-l95 added the Simulator Issue related to Block Stream Simulator label Jan 13, 2025
@georgi-l95 georgi-l95 linked a pull request Jan 28, 2025 that will close this issue
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Simulator Issue related to Block Stream Simulator
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants