Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modeled coverage #344

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Jul 5, 2023
Merged

Modeled coverage #344

merged 22 commits into from
Jul 5, 2023

Conversation

maplant
Copy link
Contributor

@maplant maplant commented Jun 20, 2023

No description provided.

@maplant maplant requested a review from madninja June 20, 2023 17:22
src/service/poc_mobile.proto Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/service/poc_mobile.proto Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
message radio_hex_signal_level {
uint64 hex_id = 1;
signal_level signal_level = 2;
double signal_power = 3;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

comment with type info?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dBm, apparently

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we use a u32 or something like we do with IoT PoC and use ddbm? trying to avoid floats since they're massive and terrible language support

src/service/poc_mobile.proto Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/service/mobile_config.proto Show resolved Hide resolved
src/service/poc_mobile.proto Show resolved Hide resolved
string location = 1;
signal_level signal_level = 2;
// Signal power of the radio in dBm (decibel-milliwatts)
double signal_power = 3;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i see a resolved comment but no explanation? don't we typically have this type of field as uint32 or uint64 with the ddBm scale comment?

src/service/poc_mobile.proto Show resolved Hide resolved
src/service/poc_mobile.proto Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@maplant maplant merged commit 01469a6 into master Jul 5, 2023
7 checks passed
@maplant maplant deleted the map/modeled-coverage branch July 5, 2023 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants