Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconfigure EU channels for higher bands #13

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: helium/hotspot
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

amirhaleem
Copy link
Member

Reconfigure the EU channels so that we can take advantage of 869.4mhz @ 500mW for PoC traffic

Copy link

@JayKickliter JayKickliter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like this. Of course we'll need to do extensive testing. I forget which repo it was, but can you paste the note about how these changes have to land atomically across several repos?

@amirhaleem
Copy link
Member Author

I like this. Of course we'll need to do extensive testing. I forget which repo it was, but can you paste the note about how these changes have to land atomically across several repos?

the other changes are for router and miner - @Vagabond has a good point about the channel/frequency PoC validation likely breaking with the way it is implemented (as it expects the onion to be sent on any of the 8 channels), and we don't have a great way to expose the region to that part of the code. will require a little more thought.

@mfalkvidd
Copy link

This suggestion would force all LoRaWAN devices on the network to use a single channel. That would have a huge impact on the overall capacity.

If LoRaWAN devices do not use this single channel, PoC in EU would become very artificial, since it uses much more power than actual devices will.

@timcooijmans
Copy link

Please don't do this: As @mfalkvidd mentions, it will give a unrealistic PoC indication while actual coverage will be much less (being limited by 25mW instead of 500mW).

@axkman
Copy link

axkman commented Jun 12, 2021

Considering only on the matter of HNT rewards PoC witnesses.

Difference USA and Europe hotspots is 27dbm and 500mwatt and 14dbm 25mwatt. It requires a 6dbm in tx power to double the distance of radio waves.
USA hotspots owners have been earning massive amounts of HNT because huge benefit of 500mwatt tx power. So they can easely have way more witnessers etc.
Europe on the other hand is limited to 25mwatt PoC witness, so their range is way lower. Especially if stock antenna's and indoor placing of hotspots. So its less easy for european hotspots owners to gain same amounts of HNT rewards by PoC witness etc.
Should the helium network offer people world wide the same level of difficulty to gain HNT rewards? USA has an unfair benefit and because this whole project for most is not only providing network coverage but has also financial rewarding aspects, shouldn't all people have the same financial benefits?

Also I agree on that if the sensors that use that network only use 14dbm than PoC on higher dbm's may kinda give artifial PoC coverage.

@amirhaleem
Copy link
Member Author

Should the helium network offer people world wide the same level of difficulty to gain HNT rewards?

as I mentioned on Discord, this is not practically possible due to differing regional regulations. for example I do not believe there is any way to transmit @ 500mW (27dBm) in any of the AS923 regions.

generally tend to agree with @mfalkvidd and @timcooijmans on this change.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants