Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Dockerize TCK #331

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ivaylogarnev-limechain
Copy link
Contributor

Description:
This PR adds a Dockerfile for building a TCK image and updates the Client configuration to ensure compatibility with the containerized environment.

Related issue(s):
#321

Checklist

  • Documented (Code comments, README, etc.)
  • Tested (unit, integration, etc.)

@ivaylogarnev-limechain ivaylogarnev-limechain marked this pull request as draft February 6, 2025 14:52
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Dockerfile Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: ivaylogarnev-limechain <[email protected]>
…les and updated the image

Signed-off-by: ivaylogarnev-limechain <[email protected]>
@ivaylogarnev-limechain ivaylogarnev-limechain marked this pull request as ready for review February 10, 2025 16:03
src/utils/docker/run-tests.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/utils/docker/network-config.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/services/Client.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: ivaylogarnev-limechain <[email protected]>
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@rwalworth rwalworth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ivaylogarnev-limechain ivaylogarnev-limechain merged commit b5e4ee9 into main Feb 12, 2025
4 checks passed
@ivaylogarnev-limechain ivaylogarnev-limechain deleted the 00321-dockerize-tck-client branch February 12, 2025 07:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants