Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add field temperature_unit in climates set_temperature action call #36625

Conversation

mib1185
Copy link
Contributor

@mib1185 mib1185 commented Dec 31, 2024

Proposed change

SSIA

Type of change

  • Spelling, grammar or other readability improvements (current branch).
  • Adjusted missing or incorrect information in the current documentation (current branch).
  • Added documentation for a new integration I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Added documentation for a new feature I'm adding to Home Assistant (next branch).
  • Removed stale or deprecated documentation.

Additional information

Checklist

  • This PR uses the correct branch, based on one of the following:
    • I made a change to the existing documentation and used the current branch.
    • I made a change that is related to an upcoming version of Home Assistant and used the next branch.
  • The documentation follows the Home Assistant documentation standards.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added optional temperature_unit parameter to climate temperature setting.
    • Introduced new automation example demonstrating temperature unit conversion.
  • Documentation
    • Updated climate integration documentation with new temperature unit specification.

@mib1185 mib1185 requested a review from a team as a code owner December 31, 2024 13:11
@home-assistant home-assistant bot added has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo next This PR goes into the next branch labels Dec 31, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Dec 31, 2024

Deploy Preview for home-assistant-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0c668c9
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/home-assistant-docs/deploys/677463fe10a8ea0008e0ef62
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-36625--home-assistant-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 31, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the Home Assistant climate integration documentation to introduce a new optional temperature_unit parameter for the climate.set_temperature action. This enhancement allows users to explicitly specify the temperature unit when setting a target temperature, with the system defaulting to the Home Assistant instance's configured unit system. The change includes an example demonstrating temperature unit conversion while maintaining the overall structure of the document.

Changes

File Change Summary
source/_integrations/climate.markdown Added optional temperature_unit parameter to climate.set_temperature action documentation and included a new automation example for temperature conversion.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant HomeAssistant
    participant ClimateDevice

    User->>HomeAssistant: climate.set_temperature
    Note over User: Specify temperature (77°F)
    Note over User: Optional temperature_unit: 'fahrenheit'
    HomeAssistant->>ClimateDevice: Convert temperature if needed
    Note over HomeAssistant: Converts 77°F to 25°C
    ClimateDevice->>HomeAssistant: Apply temperature setting
Loading

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between edc1a9a and 0c668c9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/climate.markdown (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
source/_integrations/climate.markdown

[grammar] ~102-~102: Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...bove target temperatures should be set. This defaults based on the selected unit sys...

(THIS_NNS_VB)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
source/_integrations/climate.markdown

102-102: Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe
Table pipe style

(MD055, table-pipe-style)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
source/_integrations/climate.markdown (1)

138-152: LGTM! Clear and helpful example.

The example effectively demonstrates the new temperature_unit parameter with a practical use case, showing temperature unit conversion. The comment about the conversion result (77°F → 25°C) is particularly helpful for users.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/climate.markdown (1)

102-102: Enhance parameter documentation clarity and fix formatting.

  1. Fix grammar and add trailing pipe in the table row:
-| `temperature_unit` | yes | The unit in which one of the above target temperatures should be set. This defaults based the selected unit system of your HA instance.
+| `temperature_unit` | yes | The unit in which one of the above target temperatures should be set. This defaults based on the selected unit system of your HA instance. |
  1. Consider enhancing the description by specifying the accepted values:
-| `temperature_unit` | yes | The unit in which one of the above target temperatures should be set. This defaults based on the selected unit system of your HA instance. |
+| `temperature_unit` | yes | The unit in which one of the above target temperatures should be set (`°C` or `°F`). This defaults based on the selected unit system of your HA instance. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~102-~102: Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...bove target temperatures should be set. This defaults based the selected unit system...

(THIS_NNS_VB)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

102-102: Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe
Table pipe style

(MD055, table-pipe-style)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a5c773 and bca4d8c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/climate.markdown (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
source/_integrations/climate.markdown

[grammar] ~102-~102: Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...bove target temperatures should be set. This defaults based the selected unit system...

(THIS_NNS_VB)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
source/_integrations/climate.markdown

102-102: Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe
Table pipe style

(MD055, table-pipe-style)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/_integrations/climate.markdown (2)

138-152: LGTM! Clear and helpful example.

The example effectively demonstrates:

  • Usage of the new temperature_unit parameter
  • Temperature unit conversion behavior
  • Proper YAML formatting

Line range hint 102-152: Verify alignment with core implementation.

Since this documentation change is linked to core PR #134316, let's verify the implementation details.

✅ Verification successful

Documentation matches core implementation for temperature_unit parameter

The documentation accurately reflects the core implementation changes from PR #134316:

  • The parameter name temperature_unit matches exactly with the core constant ATTR_TEMPERATURE_UNIT
  • The implementation supports both °C and °F units as shown in the selector options
  • The behavior aligns with the documentation where it's used to specify the unit for target temperature values
  • The test cases demonstrate the same usage pattern as shown in the documentation examples
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify parameter name and usage in core implementation
# Check the climate integration file in core PR for the parameter name
gh api repos/home-assistant/core/pulls/134316/files | \
  jq -r '.[] | select(.filename | contains("climate")) | .patch' | \
  grep -A 5 "temperature_unit"

Length of output: 1439

@mib1185 mib1185 force-pushed the climate/allow-field-temperature_unit-in-set_temperature-action-call branch from bca4d8c to edc1a9a Compare December 31, 2024 13:16
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
source/_integrations/climate.markdown (1)

102-102: Enhance parameter documentation and fix table formatting.

  1. Add trailing pipe to maintain consistent table formatting
  2. Consider listing supported temperature units explicitly
-| `temperature_unit` | yes | The unit in which the above target temperatures should be set. This defaults based on the selected unit system of your HA instance.
+| `temperature_unit` | yes | The unit in which the above target temperatures should be set. This defaults based on the selected unit system of your HA instance. Supported values: `°F`, `°C`. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~102-~102: Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...bove target temperatures should be set. This defaults based on the selected unit sys...

(THIS_NNS_VB)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)

102-102: Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe
Table pipe style

(MD055, table-pipe-style)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bca4d8c and edc1a9a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • source/_integrations/climate.markdown (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
source/_integrations/climate.markdown

[grammar] ~102-~102: Did you mean “these”?
Context: ...bove target temperatures should be set. This defaults based on the selected unit sys...

(THIS_NNS_VB)

🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
source/_integrations/climate.markdown

102-102: Expected: leading_and_trailing; Actual: leading_only; Missing trailing pipe
Table pipe style

(MD055, table-pipe-style)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
source/_integrations/climate.markdown (2)

138-152: LGTM! Clear and helpful example.

The example effectively demonstrates temperature unit conversion while maintaining consistency with other examples in the document.


Line range hint 102-152: Verify documentation matches core implementation.

Since this documentation change is linked to core PR #134316, let's verify the implementation details match.

Copy link
Member

@frenck frenck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Approved. Can be merged as soon as the parent PR gets merged.

@frenck frenck added the awaits-parent Awaits the merge of an parent PR label Dec 31, 2024
@mib1185
Copy link
Contributor Author

mib1185 commented Jan 2, 2025

Going to close this, since the architectural discussion needs to be done first and most properly it will result in a different, more generic solution

@mib1185 mib1185 closed this Jan 2, 2025
@home-assistant home-assistant bot removed the awaits-parent Awaits the merge of an parent PR label Jan 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 3, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
has-parent This PR has a parent PR in a other repo next This PR goes into the next branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants