fix: DPL: limit scaling sanity checks #725
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
do not scale limit if inverter is not producing, as DC channel power is expected to be close to zero anyways. do not scale limit if current inverter limit is small, such that channels might produce very little power exactly because the limit is so low. move the calculation out of setNewPowerLimit and into a new function, so that we can make use of return statements there.
|
This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new discussion or issue for related concerns. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
do not scale limit if inverter is not producing, as DC channel power is expected to be close to zero anyways.
do not scale limit if current inverter limit is small, such that channels might produce very little power exactly because the limit is so low.
move the calculation out of setNewPowerLimit and into a new function, so that we can make use of return statements there.