Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HPCC-29923 Avoid CRowServer cancel if not running #17573

Conversation

jakesmith
Copy link
Member

@jakesmith jakesmith commented Jul 10, 2023

This avoids an inherent delay being introduced by the MP layer.

CRowServer is used by Global Group, Global TopN and a refactoring
form of IndexWrite (where is merges down to less parts).

Type of change:

  • This change is a bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • This change is a new feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • This change improves the code (refactor or other change that does not change the functionality)
  • This change fixes warnings (the fix does not alter the functionality or the generated code)
  • This change is a breaking change (fix or feature that will cause existing behavior to change).
  • This change alters the query API (existing queries will have to be recompiled)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the code style of this project.
    • My code does not create any new warnings from compiler, build system, or lint.
  • The commit message is properly formatted and free of typos.
    • The commit message title makes sense in a changelog, by itself.
    • The commit is signed.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly, or...
    • I have created a JIRA ticket to update the documentation.
    • Any new interfaces or exported functions are appropriately commented.
  • I have read the CONTRIBUTORS document.
  • The change has been fully tested:
    • I have added tests to cover my changes.
    • All new and existing tests passed.
    • I have checked that this change does not introduce memory leaks.
    • I have used Valgrind or similar tools to check for potential issues.
  • I have given due consideration to all of the following potential concerns:
    • Scalability
    • Performance
    • Security
    • Thread-safety
    • Cloud-compatibility
    • Premature optimization
    • Existing deployed queries will not be broken
    • This change fixes the problem, not just the symptom
    • The target branch of this pull request is appropriate for such a change.
  • There are no similar instances of the same problem that should be addressed
    • I have addressed them here
    • I have raised JIRA issues to address them separately
  • This is a user interface / front-end modification
    • I have tested my changes in multiple modern browsers
    • The component(s) render as expected

Smoketest:

  • Send notifications about my Pull Request position in Smoketest queue.
  • Test my draft Pull Request.

Testing:

@github-actions
Copy link

@jakesmith jakesmith requested a review from ghalliday July 10, 2023 16:45
Copy link
Member

@ghalliday ghalliday left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jakesmith One comment - looks good.
Is 9.2.x the correct target?

bool wanted = true;
if (running.compare_exchange_strong(wanted, false))
{
running = false;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

trivial: not needed (it will be set to false by the compare_exchange

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removed.

@jakesmith
Copy link
Member Author

Is 9.2.x the correct target?

I figured that it's probably safe, but a very long standing issue that doesn't need to go into 9.0.x, so 9.2.x was more appropriate,
but happy to change it to 9.0.x if you think it would be good to?

@ghalliday
Copy link
Member

@jakesmith does it only affect groups? It is a bug fix which is relatively trivial so I think 9.0.x would be appropriate.

@GordonSmith if Jake agrees with my comment and removes the assignment then it can be merged.

@jakesmith jakesmith force-pushed the HPCC-29923-avoid-rowserver-cancel branch from 6563f61 to beba95a Compare July 12, 2023 08:48
This avoids an inherent delay being introduced by the MP layer.

CRowServer is used by Global Group, Global TopN and a refactoring
form of IndexWrite (where is merges down to less parts).

Signed-off-by: Jake Smith <[email protected]>
@jakesmith jakesmith force-pushed the HPCC-29923-avoid-rowserver-cancel branch from beba95a to 99af224 Compare July 12, 2023 08:53
@jakesmith jakesmith changed the base branch from candidate-9.2.x to candidate-9.0.x July 12, 2023 08:53
@jakesmith
Copy link
Member Author

@jakesmith does it only affect groups? It is a bug fix which is relatively trivial so I think 9.0.x would be appropriate.

I've updated the commit/PR message, but as per the JIRA title, it is also used in Global TopN and a unusual indexwrite case.

@GordonSmith if Jake agrees with my comment and removes the assignment then it can be merged.

unnecessary assignment removed.
Rebased to 9.0.x

@jakesmith
Copy link
Member Author

@GordonSmith if Jake agrees with my comment and removes the assignment then it can be merged.

@GordonSmith - rebased to 9.0.x - I think you can merge it.

@GordonSmith GordonSmith merged commit 784285f into hpcc-systems:candidate-9.0.x Jul 13, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants