Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resumable: fix metadata #3028

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2025
Merged

resumable: fix metadata #3028

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

reschke
Copy link
Contributor

@reschke reschke commented Mar 4, 2025

No description provided.

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ normative:
CACHING: RFC9111
RFC9112:
display: HTTP/1.1
STRUCTURED-FIELDS: RFC9651
STRUCTURED-FIELDS: RFC8941
Copy link
Member

@Acconut Acconut Mar 4, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is RFC 9651 not the correct reference for structured fields? As far as I understand it, RFC 8941 is obsoleted by RFC 9651.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is. I probably PRd based on a version too old. Please ignore this part.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

now fixed.

Copy link
Member

@Acconut Acconut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@Acconut Acconut merged commit 020f9f8 into main Mar 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@Acconut Acconut deleted the reschke/resumable1 branch March 4, 2025 22:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants