Remove unnecessary network reset

[zguesmi]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.50%. Comparing base (0db31c3) to head (5af09f8).
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #186   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    84.50%   84.50%           
========================================
  Files           35       35           
  Lines         1084     1084           
  Branches       221      221           
========================================
  Hits           916      916           
  Misses         168      168           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Le-Caignec]

This PR makes me think that it could be a good idea to introduce Zod for environment validation, just like we did for the voucher repo.

[jeremyjams]

Great, thank you!

[jeremyjams]

Are we all good in poco-chain?

[zguesmi]

Yes, I have already checked that we break nothing in:

• poco-chain
• iexec-voucher-contracts-it

But I should note that some cleaning has to be done in poco-chain project, I created an issue with the required details: https://github.com/iExecBlockchainComputing/poco-chain/issues/25

[zguesmi]

This PR makes me think that it could be a good idea to introduce Zod for environment validation, just like we did for the voucher repo.

It's a good idea, however, I'd rather keep it for a separate PR.