Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #9

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Update README.md #9

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

SuvamSaswat
Copy link

No description provided.

README.md Outdated
@@ -54,9 +54,9 @@ O-IL8-15 Biological Probe, in Structural Genomics Consortium: [thesgc.org/biolog

---
## AlphaFold2
AlphaFold2 is a deep learning system that predicts protein structures from amino acid sequences. We used the open-source distribution of AlphaFold2, [ColabFold](https://github.com/sokrypton/ColabFold) to predict the structure of the antibody. In particular, we used the [AlphaFold2_mmseqs2](https://colab.research.google.com/github/sokrypton/ColabFold/blob/main/AlphaFold2.ipynb) notebook. This notebook differs from full AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold2 Colab in that it uses MMseqs2 (Many-against-Many sequence searching) in place of homology detection and MSA pairing.
AlphaFold2 is a deep learning system that predicts protein structures from amino acid sequences. We used the open-source distribution of AlphaFold2, [ColabFold](https://github.com/sokrypton/ColabFold) to predict the structure of the antibody. In particular, we used the [AlphaFold2_mmseqs2](https://colab.research.google.com/github/sokrypton/ColabFold/blob/main/AlphaFold2.ipynb) notebook. This notebook differs from full AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold2 Colab in that it uses MMseqs2 (Many-against-Many sequence searching) in place of homology detection and MSA pairing. MMseqs2 can predict complex structures with great accuracy, as compared to AlphaFold2.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this addition seems a little inaccurate. Can you mention a source in the comments?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I reviewed the references, and this sentence has a flaw. It should be about speed and complexity, rather than accuracy, and it should be MSA pairing rather than AlphaFold2.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-022-01488-1
https://computationalbiomed.hms.harvard.edu/tools-technologies-old/alphafold-colabfold/

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay, cool! Why not also cite the source ?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the second one is not a citation, so shall I add that or not?

@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ This immediately places the I-TASSER model in a much more reliable position than

### Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD)

We now see the RMSD of the AlphaFold2 and I-TASSER models with respect to each other. This is done after superimposing the models on the same reference structure, through the Kabsch algorithm.
We now see the RMSD of the AlphaFold2 and I-TASSER models with respect to each other. RMSD determines the similarity between the two models. It provides the average deviation of corresponding atoms in the two models. This is done after superimposing the models on the same reference structure, through the Kabsch algorithm. Kabsch algorithm is a method of calculating the optimal translation and rotation which produces least value of RMSD. Lesser the value of RMSD, more similar are the two models.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems good

Copy link
Member

@mrigankpawagi mrigankpawagi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's merge this with the citation.

@mrigankpawagi
Copy link
Member

mrigankpawagi commented Oct 4, 2023

Cool, looks good. I will hold this here for a while till our Wiki content is finalized (I will redirect this to that). Will modify the READMEs here after that. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants