Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vnip2 sgrulelocal #332

Closed
wants to merge 93 commits into from
Closed

Vnip2 sgrulelocal #332

wants to merge 93 commits into from

Conversation

SunithaGudisagarIBM1
Copy link
Collaborator

Community Note

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Relates OR Closes #0000

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccXXX'

...

@ujjwal-ibm
Copy link
Collaborator

rebase the PR

@@ -289,6 +289,16 @@ func resourceIBMISSecurityGroupRead(d *schema.ResourceData, meta interface{}) er
}
}
}
local, ok := rule.Local.(*vpcv1.SecurityGroupRuleLocal)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test cases updation required

@SunithaGudisagarIBM1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

we will be using #301 PR which has the rebased changes and the updated test cases which has been tested..

1 similar comment
@SunithaGudisagarIBM1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

we will be using #301 PR which has the rebased changes and the updated test cases which has been tested..

@SunithaGudisagarIBM1 SunithaGudisagarIBM1 deleted the vnip2-sgrulelocal branch July 22, 2024 15:49
@SunithaGudisagarIBM1 SunithaGudisagarIBM1 restored the vnip2-sgrulelocal branch July 22, 2024 15:49
@SunithaGudisagarIBM1 SunithaGudisagarIBM1 deleted the vnip2-sgrulelocal branch December 1, 2024 10:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants