Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Subhampal9 current mirror fix #355

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Subhampal9
Copy link

https://open-source-silicon.slack.com/archives/C072ZFE19FH/p1732758626658539?thread_ts=1732636138.678739&cid=C072ZFE19FH

Previously ptap and pwell was getting layed out irrespective of the device type. Codes were added to add tap and well layers depending on the device type

1. drc and lvs reports are also attached
2. sample picture of gds is attached
3.  README file and annotations in fvf.py are added
added FVF Pcell files, Analog Vibes, Chipathon 2024
Previously a ptap and pwell was layed out irrespective of the device type. Added the code to add specific tap and well layers for each device type
Copy link
Collaborator

@alibillalhammoud alibillalhammoud left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good


return netlist

def sky130_add_fvf_labels(fvf_in: Component) -> Component:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can this function be made pdk agnostic?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This function is only used for LVS check

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is fine. Is it specific to the sky130 pdk? If so, can it be made generic using the MappedPDK class?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It uses layers which are not mapped in Mappedpdk(as far as I know).

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, in that case it is fine.

…F directory

Now it only contains the change in current_mirror block
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants