Skip to content

Conversation

florisvdh
Copy link
Member

@florisvdh florisvdh commented Sep 16, 2020

This amends PR #27

  • move files in the right folder
  • use (more) future-proof R code (PROJ>=6 compliant), and add a bit explanation on this.

florisvdh added 10 commits June 23, 2020 11:00
The use of 'proj4string' in R code is confusing in times where PROJ.4 strings are obsoleted.
It can be expected that a more general function name to set an object's CRS will sooner or later
be promoted instead of proj4string<-, hence preparing for that already by using the function instead of the slot.
I expect the proj4string slot will most probably remain in use for compatibility reasons, but
explicitly naming it is better avoided in times where WKT2 strings are actually used to define a CRS.
@florisvdh florisvdh marked this pull request as draft September 16, 2020 13:13
@florisvdh florisvdh changed the title PROJ>=6 compliance in 'estimate densities from point patterns' 'estimate densities from point patterns': PROJ>=6 compliance Sep 23, 2020
@florisvdh florisvdh requested a review from ThierryO September 23, 2020 13:13
@florisvdh florisvdh marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2020 13:15
@florisvdh florisvdh merged commit 3408a91 into density Feb 17, 2021
@florisvdh florisvdh deleted the density_fv branch February 17, 2021 10:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants