Skip to content

fix(monolith): add configurable db, table, and column limits to enterprise #6242

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sanderson
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Rebased/mergeable

@sanderson sanderson marked this pull request as ready for review July 23, 2025 21:19
@sanderson sanderson requested a review from Copilot July 23, 2025 21:19
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds configurable database, table, and column limits to InfluxDB 3 Enterprise, allowing administrators to adjust these limits beyond the default values. The changes primarily involve updating documentation to distinguish between Enterprise (configurable) and Core (fixed) limit behaviors.

Key changes:

  • Document new Enterprise-specific configuration options for database, table, and column limits
  • Update shared documentation to differentiate between Enterprise and Core limit behaviors
  • Add configuration reference documentation for the new limit options

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
content/shared/influxdb3-admin/databases/create.md Updates database limit section to show different messaging for Enterprise vs Core
content/shared/influxdb3-admin/databases/_index.md Adds Enterprise-specific content about configurable limits and retention periods
content/influxdb3/enterprise/reference/config-options.md Documents three new configuration options for database, table, and column limits

@sanderson sanderson requested review from jstirnaman and MeelahMe July 25, 2025 19:19
Copy link
Contributor

@MeelahMe MeelahMe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants