Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps-dev): bump org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.25.1 to 3.25.2 #995

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jan 29, 2024

Bumps org.assertj:assertj-core from 3.25.1 to 3.25.2.

Release notes

Sourced from org.assertj:assertj-core's releases.

v3.25.2

🐛 Bug Fixes

  • Fix unresolvable Javadoc stylesheet URLs, simplify configuration #3324

Core

  • Fix missing configuration for MatcherAssert soft assertions
  • Make deprecation notice visible in AbstractAssert#asList #3327
  • Recursive comparison uses equals on root object when useOverriddenEquals is enabled #3320
  • satisfiesExactlyInAnyOrder fails if actual overrides equals #3339
  • Avoid calling actual.hashCode() and expected.hashCode() in DualValue #3340
  • Recursive comparison checks for existence of fields in types that parameterize nested unordered iterables #3332

🔨 Dependency Upgrades

  • Upgrade to EqualsVerifier 3.15.6 #3329
  • Upgrade to Maven Surefire Plugin 3.2.5 #3328
  • Upgrade to Spotless Maven Plugin 2.43.0 #3345

❤️ Contributors

Thanks to all the contributors who worked on this release:

@​manusa @​davidboden

Commits
  • 96ef63e [maven-release-plugin] prepare release assertj-build-3.25.2
  • abdb210 chore(deps): bump com.diffplug.spotless:spotless-maven-plugin from 2.41.1 to ...
  • 3132090 Recursive comparison: only check the compared fields existence at the root le...
  • e9ebcc2 DualValue hash code is not computed properly because it calls actual.hashCode...
  • d51cfd9 Remove elements by reference in assertSatisfiesExactlyInAnyOrder
  • 7f786bd The recursive comparison should never use equals on root objects since it def...
  • e0f4542 chore(deps-dev): bump nl.jqno.equalsverifier:equalsverifier from 3.15.5 to 3....
  • 19b9b3d chore(deps): bump org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-surefire-plugin from 3.2.3 t...
  • 470c1ec doc: deprecation notice visible in AbstractAssert#asList (#3327)
  • 0521edf Fix missing configuration for MatcherAssert soft assertions
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [org.assertj:assertj-core](https://github.com/assertj/assertj) from 3.25.1 to 3.25.2.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/assertj/assertj/releases)
- [Commits](assertj/assertj@assertj-build-3.25.1...assertj-build-3.25.2)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: org.assertj:assertj-core
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label Jan 29, 2024
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (996f357) 54.89% compared to head (ebfb74e) 61.05%.

❗ Current head ebfb74e differs from pull request most recent head 405a0b2. Consider uploading reports for the commit 405a0b2 to get more accurate results

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #995      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     54.89%   61.05%   +6.15%     
- Complexity      387      437      +50     
============================================
  Files            71       71              
  Lines          2583     2583              
  Branches        278      278              
============================================
+ Hits           1418     1577     +159     
+ Misses         1095      933     -162     
- Partials         70       73       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@majst01 majst01 merged commit ee7059e into master Jan 29, 2024
18 checks passed
@majst01 majst01 deleted the dependabot/maven/org.assertj-assertj-core-3.25.2 branch January 29, 2024 06:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants