Add some synonym types

[cthoyt]

Related to #122 and #70

See template sheet in this PR at https://github.com/cthoyt/ontology-metadata/blob/add-synonym-types/src/templates/annotation_properties.tsv.

This PR also adds SSSOM mappings from these new terms to external vocabularies, specifically HP, in https://github.com/cthoyt/ontology-metadata/blob/add-synonym-types/src/ontology/components/omo-to-external.tsv

[matentzn]

oh I should have told you that beforehand, sorry about that: https://github.com/information-artifact-ontology/ontology-metadata/blob/master/src/templates/annotation_properties.tsv

Forget we did that.. This template ensures we capture all necessary metadata in the right form;

I will see that I can prioritise finding Chris time for this because the first PR should be reviewed by he man himself. Just so we don't regret it later.

[cthoyt]

@matentzn i have now properly filled out the sheet so the appropriate ODK release commands can be used to turn the template into terms. should I do this in this PR, or it will get taken care of during release?

[matentzn]

I will take it from here!

[cthoyt]

There are already a few exact property matches I want to encode in this PR from human phenotype ontology:

• http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/hp#layperson
• http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/hp#abbreviation
• http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/hp#plural_form
• http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/hp#uk_spelling

Whats the best way to do this?

[matentzn]

I will encourage HPO to swap theirs out once this PR is in.

[cthoyt]

Either way, there will be artifacts of these in the wild for a long time until everyone has updated their HP imports. Wouldn't it be better to be defensive and plan for that situation?

[matentzn]

Yes, you are right of course. Probably best to keep such mappings in a separate sssom file rather than adding them to the source, because what we don't want is all these IRIs being added to the vocab..

[cthoyt]

Yes, you are right of course. Probably best to keep such mappings in a separate sssom file rather than adding them to the source, because what we don't want is all these IRIs being added to the vocab..

Added in cthoyt@f188e8e

[matentzn]

Nice!

[matentzn]

Let's go ahead but documented permitted synonym scopes, and provide a core omo-synonym release (these are notes to me myself)

[matentzn]

This has been open for a very long time.

Thanks @cthoyt for the repeated pings.