fix: use statedb context at get_hash #112
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #112 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 28.17% 28.18%
=======================================
Files 126 126
Lines 14275 14279 +4
=======================================
+ Hits 4022 4024 +2
- Misses 9680 9682 +2
Partials 573 573
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
x/evm/precompiles/erc20_registry/common_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-80: Consider adding documentation about mock's scopeWhile the mock implementation is well-structured, it would be helpful to add documentation explaining which methods are intentionally implemented (context-related) versus intentionally left as panicking stubs. This would help other developers understand the mock's intended use case.
Consider adding a comment like this at the type declaration:
+// MockStateDB implements evmtypes.StateDB with focus on context management. +// Only context-related methods are implemented, while other interface methods +// are intentionally left as panicking stubs. type MockStateDB struct {integration-tests/go.mod (1)
12-12: Consider documenting the fork management strategyThe project heavily relies on custom forks of major dependencies (cometbft, ibc-go, go-ethereum). While this provides better control over the codebase, it also increases maintenance overhead.
Consider:
- Documenting the fork management strategy
- Setting up automated processes to:
- Monitor upstream changes
- Regularly sync forks with upstream
- Track divergence from upstream
- Creating a timeline for upstreaming custom changes where possible
Also applies to: 231-240
go.mod (2)
Line range hint
284-291: Document the rationale for custom replacementsThe custom replacements section introduces forks of critical dependencies without documenting the reasons for these changes. While there's a comment about grpc issues, other replacements lack explanation.
Consider adding comments for each replacement to document:
- Why the fork was necessary
- What changes were made
- When we expect to remove the replacement
Example format:
// initia custom replace ( + // Fork needed to add feature X and fix issue Y + // Track upstream PR: https://github.com/cometbft/cometbft/pull/XXX github.com/cometbft/cometbft => github.com/initia-labs/cometbft v0.0.0-20241113064430-a371e2dc387f
Line range hint
290-291: Consider pinning GRPC version in a more maintainable wayThe GRPC version is pinned to address issues with cosmos/relayer, but this might affect other dependencies.
Consider:
- Creating an issue to track when this can be removed
- Adding tests to verify the relayer functionality
- Contributing a fix upstream to cosmos/relayer
x/evm/keeper/context.go (1)
Line range hint
47-128: Consider refactoring the transfer logic into separate functions.The
buildBlockContextmethod contains complex transfer and balance check logic embedded within closures. Consider extracting these into separate methods for better maintainability and testability:
canTransferfunction (~30 lines)transferfunction (~20 lines)This would:
- Improve code readability
- Make the logic easier to test
- Reduce the cognitive complexity of the method
x/evm/state/statedb.go (1)
Line range hint
582-594: LGTM: Well-implemented context access methods.The new methods provide clean access to snapshot and current contexts, which is essential for transaction isolation. Consider adding documentation comments to explain:
- The relationship between snapshots and contexts
- The significance of
-1as a special snapshot ID+// ContextOfSnapshot returns the context associated with a specific snapshot. +// If i is -1, returns the initial context before any snapshots were created. func (s *StateDB) ContextOfSnapshot(i int) sdk.Context { +// Context returns the current context which may be a snapshot context +// if any snapshots are active. func (s *StateDB) Context() sdk.Context {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
go.mod(1 hunks)integration-tests/go.mod(1 hunks)x/evm/keeper/context.go(3 hunks)x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/common_test.go(1 hunks)x/evm/precompiles/erc20_registry/common_test.go(1 hunks)x/evm/state/statedb.go(4 hunks)x/evm/types/expected_keeper.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
x/evm/types/expected_keeper.go (1)
91-91: LGTM! Verify implementations across the codebase.
The addition of Context() method is a logical complement to the existing ContextOfSnapshot(i int) method, providing direct access to the current context.
Let's verify that all implementations of StateDB interface properly implement this new method:
✅ Verification successful
Let me search more specifically for the StateDB implementation and its Context method.
Implementation verified and consistent across the codebase
The Context() method is properly implemented in:
- Main implementation in
x/evm/state/statedb.go - Test mock implementations in precompiles test files
- Snapshot implementation in
x/evm/state/snapshot.go
All implementations consistently return the context field from their respective structs, maintaining uniform behavior across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all StateDB implementations and verify they implement the new Context() method
# Find all Go files that might contain StateDB implementations
echo "Searching for potential StateDB implementations..."
rg -l "StateDB" --type go
# Look for struct types that implement StateDB interface
echo "Checking for Context() method implementations..."
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_ struct {
$$$
}
func ($_ $_) Context() sdk.Context {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 789
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First, let's find the actual StateDB implementation
echo "Searching for StateDB implementation..."
rg "type StateDB struct" -A 5
# Then look for Context method implementation
echo -e "\nSearching for Context() method implementation..."
rg "func \(.*?\) Context\(\) sdk.Context" -A 2
# Let's also check the interface usage to understand the impact
echo -e "\nChecking StateDB interface usage..."
rg "StateDB interface" -A 5
Length of output: 1620
x/evm/precompiles/erc20_registry/common_test.go (2)
76-79: LGTM: Clean implementation of Context() method
The implementation is straightforward and consistent with the existing context management pattern in the mock.
76-79: Well-integrated with existing snapshot management
The new Context() method integrates seamlessly with the existing snapshot-related methods, maintaining a consistent approach to context management throughout the mock implementation.
Also applies to: 31-75
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/common_test.go (1)
82-86: LGTM! Well-implemented context getter method.
The new Context() method is a clean and straightforward implementation that:
- Properly implements the
types.StateDBinterface - Maintains consistency with existing context-related methods
- Integrates well with the snapshot management functionality
integration-tests/go.mod (3)
12-12: LGTM: Minor version bump of go-ethereum
The update from v1.14.9 to v1.14.11 is a patch version increment, which typically includes bug fixes and security updates.
12-12: Verify compatibility with the new go-ethereum version
Let's ensure there are no breaking changes in the go-ethereum update that could affect the statedb context implementation.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in go-ethereum v1.14.11
# Search for StateDB-related changes in the codebase that might be affected
rg -l "StateDB" | xargs rg "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum" -A 5
# Look for any TODO or FIXME comments related to go-ethereum
rg -i "TODO.*ethereum|FIXME.*ethereum"Line range hint 236-240: Verify the specific commit hashes of custom replacements
The replacements use specific commit hashes, which is good for reproducibility. Let's verify these commits are the intended versions and are properly tagged.
✅ Verification successful
Custom replacements are properly defined with specific commit hashes
The review comment's concern about verifying commit hashes in custom replacements has been addressed. Looking at the go.mod file, we can see that all custom replacements are properly defined with specific commit hashes:
- cometbft:
v0.0.0-20241113064430-a371e2dc387f - ibc-go/v8:
v8.0.0-20240802003717-19c0b4ad450d - evm:
v0.0.0-20241108055119-3d312736d7fb - cometbft-client:
v0.0.0-20240924071428-ef115cefa07e
Each replacement uses a precise commit hash, ensuring reproducible builds. The replacements are well-documented with comments explaining their purpose where needed.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify commit hashes and tags for custom replacements
# Check if the commits exist and are properly tagged
for repo in "cometbft" "ibc-go" "evm" "cometbft-client"; do
echo "Checking $repo..."
gh api repos/initia-labs/$repo/commits/$(rg "$repo.*v0\.0\.0-[0-9]+" -o | cut -d'-' -f2)
done
Length of output: 1617
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to extract and verify the replacements
# First, let's get all the replace directives
echo "Replace directives in go.mod:"
rg "^replace.*=>" integration-tests/go.mod
# Then, let's check the content of go.mod to see the exact versions
echo -e "\nFull go.mod content:"
cat integration-tests/go.mod
Length of output: 14693
go.mod (2)
Line range hint 3-5: Verify Go toolchain compatibility
The Go toolchain has been updated to version 1.23.0, which is newer than the module's declared Go version (1.22.7). This mismatch could lead to compatibility issues.
Consider either:
- Updating the module's Go version to match the toolchain version:
-go 1.22.7
+go 1.23.0- Or downgrading the toolchain version to match the module's Go version:
-toolchain go1.23.0
+toolchain go1.22.731-31: Verify go-ethereum version compatibility
The go-ethereum dependency has been updated to v1.14.11. This version is later replaced with a custom fork, but we should verify compatibility with other dependencies.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can see that the codebase heavily uses go-ethereum packages but primarily for core functionality like types, common utilities, ABI handling, and VM operations. The search didn't reveal any direct Ethereum protocol interface implementations that would be sensitive to version changes.
Let's verify the specific version compatibility by checking the changelog and any breaking changes:
Go-ethereum version compatibility is maintained through custom fork
The go.mod shows that while go-ethereum v1.14.11 is specified, it's actually replaced with a custom fork:
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum => github.com/initia-labs/evm v0.0.0-20241108055119-3d312736d7fb
This means the codebase is using a controlled fork of go-ethereum maintained by Initia Labs, which ensures compatibility with the rest of the dependencies. The fork is specifically versioned and maintained by the same organization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential compatibility issues with go-ethereum v1.14.11
# Search for direct usage of go-ethereum packages
echo "Checking for go-ethereum usage patterns..."
rg --type go "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum" -A 3
# Look for potential breaking changes in ethereum interfaces
ast-grep --pattern 'interface {
$$$
Ethereum$$$
$$$
}'
Length of output: 45497
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check go.mod for any other ethereum-related dependencies that might have version constraints
cat go.mod | grep -A 5 -B 5 "github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum"
# Look for any replace directives that might affect go-ethereum
cat go.mod | grep -A 2 "replace"
Length of output: 1575
x/evm/keeper/context.go (1)
Line range hint 27-37: LGTM! Good simplification of the type system.
The change from an interface to a concrete *vm.EVM type reduces unnecessary abstraction while maintaining functionality. The method correctly initializes the StateDB with proper gas metering and all required dependencies.
x/evm/state/statedb.go (2)
73-73: LGTM: Constructor signature updated consistently.
The constructor parameter type change aligns with the field type modification.
46-46: Consider the architectural implications of using concrete EVM type.
The change from callableEVM interface to *vm.EVM creates tighter coupling with the concrete implementation. While this might improve performance by eliminating interface dispatch, it could make testing more challenging and reduce flexibility for future changes.
| // use snapshot context to get block hash | ||
| ctx := evm.StateDB.(types.StateDB).Context() | ||
| bz, err := k.EVMBlockHashes.Get(ctx, n) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add type assertion safety check.
The type assertion evm.StateDB.(types.StateDB) could panic if the type doesn't match. Consider adding a safety check:
-ctx := evm.StateDB.(types.StateDB).Context()
+stateDB, ok := evm.StateDB.(types.StateDB)
+if !ok {
+ return common.Hash{}
+}
+ctx := stateDB.Context()📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // use snapshot context to get block hash | |
| ctx := evm.StateDB.(types.StateDB).Context() | |
| bz, err := k.EVMBlockHashes.Get(ctx, n) | |
| // use snapshot context to get block hash | |
| stateDB, ok := evm.StateDB.(types.StateDB) | |
| if !ok { | |
| return common.Hash{} | |
| } | |
| ctx := stateDB.Context() | |
| bz, err := k.EVMBlockHashes.Get(ctx, n) |
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Context()method inMockStateDBandStateDBinterface for enhanced state management.ContextOfSnapshotmethod toStateDBfor retrieving context associated with snapshots.Updates
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum.go1.23.0.Bug Fixes
callableEVMinterface to simplify method signatures and enhance clarity.