-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal for new Evaluation repo #79
Conversation
ec0937d
to
dfad7d9
Compare
2678fd5
to
88ed642
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one suggested addition
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm - going to leave this open a while longer to gather more ACKs
Signed-off-by: Nathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
eb2af00
to
1b40cb0
Compare
LGTM |
Besides the paragraph I wanted removed, this proposal in fantastic! Thanks Nathan! |
Co-authored-by: Ali Maredia <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Nathan Weinberg <[email protected]>
1133893
to
686870e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, nice work @nathan-weinberg
@nathan-weinberg I believe our intent is to have proposals for new repos approved by the Oversight Committee, though I admit that if that is true it could be made more clear in our governance documentation. Arrived here via ping from @russellb to the oversight committee to review this proposal, so will let him as pinger and Oversight Committee chair opine on my statement above. |
@lhawthorn thanks! I assumed the approval from @russellb as a member of the Oversight Committee fulfilled that requirement, is that not the case? The repo is already created so it's a moot point now, but if more process is needed someone will need to flesh that out in the doc you linked for next time. |
LGTM |
Resolves #76