Skip to content

[SYCL] Re-assign HIP device aspeects #18835

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: sycl
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

frasercrmck
Copy link
Contributor

This commit, in addition to some minor formatting:

  • Adds the fp16 aspect to all devices.
  • Adds the atomic64 aspect to the two tested devices (gfx90a & gfx1030)
    • The runtime reports this aspect based on querying the device for 'int64' attributes, which doesn't seem right as the aspect covers fp64 atomics too.
  • Removes the usm_system_allocations from all devices
    • As best as I can see this will depend on things like PCIe so is not (currently) possible to determine in the compiler.

This commit, in addition to some minor formatting:

* Adds the fp16 aspect to all devices.
* Adds the atomic64 aspect to the two tested devices (gfx90a & gfx1030)
  * The runtime reports this aspect based on querying the device for
    'int64' attributes, which doesn't seem right as the aspect covers
    fp64 atomics too.
* Removes the usm_system_allocations from all devices
  * As best as I can see this will depend on things like PCIe so is not
    (currently) possible to determine in the compiler.
@frasercrmck frasercrmck requested a review from a team as a code owner June 5, 2025 16:23
@frasercrmck frasercrmck requested a review from GeorgeWeb June 5, 2025 16:24
Copy link
Contributor

@maarquitos14 maarquitos14 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Copy link
Contributor

@GeorgeWeb GeorgeWeb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. Thanks for correcting these.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants