Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Netrics Built-In: NDT7 client #23

Open
marcwitasee opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Netrics Built-In: NDT7 client #23

marcwitasee opened this issue Feb 28, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@marcwitasee
Copy link
Contributor

Port NDT7 client from Netrics v1 to v2.

The module should take the following default parameters for the binary:

  • Scheme (-scheme ws)
  • Set format to JSON (-format json)

The module should produce the following data fields:

  • Download bandwidth (Mbps)
  • Upload bandwidth (Mbps)
  • Download Retransmissions
  • Download Latency
  • Server
  • Total Bytes used by test
@marcwitasee marcwitasee added this to the Beta milestone Feb 28, 2023
jesteria added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2023
* implemented timeout
* fixed output parsing
* etc.

see #23
jesteria added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 8, 2023
The NDT7 test is made the model for speed test configuration (by the
alphabet and as it requires no additional paramters).

speed-ookla is intended to have the same configuration, with additional
parameters -- and so YAML anchor/alias is used.

Fate is upgraded to receive a bug-fix fully supporting this YAML
feature.

See #23
jesteria added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 12, 2023
* implemented timeout
* fixed output parsing
* etc.

see #23
jesteria added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 12, 2023
The NDT7 test is made the model for speed test configuration (by the
alphabet and as it requires no additional paramters).

speed-ookla is intended to have the same configuration, with additional
parameters -- and so YAML anchor/alias is used.

Fate is upgraded to receive a bug-fix fully supporting this YAML
feature.

See #23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants