TimeZones <= 1.5 for testing #117
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
A temporary solution to restrict our test TimeZones.jl release to <= 1.5. Eventually, we should: 1. Update our specimen files 2. Migrate our tests to load JLSO files in a separate process/environment and pass specific tests/checks to those activated environments - We should probably also define a more explicit upgrade workflow that uses this approach as well
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #117 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 97.67% 97.67%
=======================================
Files 6 6
Lines 215 215
=======================================
Hits 210 210
Misses 5 5 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
oxinabox
approved these changes
Nov 24, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A temporary solution to restrict our test TimeZones.jl release to <= 1.5. Eventually, we should:
Closes #115