-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: usage of potentially wrong melos version during script execution #783
Draft
bspinner
wants to merge
2
commits into
invertase:main
Choose a base branch
from
bspinner:fix/executable_path_handling
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Melos should always run scripts etc with the version that is defined in
dev_dependencies
, even if it is started directly from the version on path.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, thanks for the quick review.
Is this a future enhancement request or already implemented? 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The overarching goal of this PR is to eliminate ambiguity and surprises in the build process of Dart/Flutter applications. In line with that, I believe it would be ideal for Melos to behave in a consistent and predictable way.
Here’s what I think could be considered "unexpected" behavior:
pubspec.lock
.dev_dependencies
might only define a minimum version, which wouldn’t fully address this, as you likely know as well. :)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's already implemented, try pinning you melos version to an older version an see what happens. :)
If one wants a specific version of melos, why not just pin the version in pubspec? I don't see the need for any separate feature for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@spydon Am I correct in understanding that you're unhappy with the comment in the code? If so, could you suggest a better or more accurate phrasing? :)
Additionally, if the only remaining blocker for merging is the failing tests, I’d be happy to look into the breaking cod – given it's likely the changes will be merged. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do the tests not fail locally for you?
There are also some analyze issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm referring to the output created by the scripts used for testing. All it says is "test_script failed to execute" – but what output did it generate? I.e. why did it fail?
The tests fail locally for me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm curious, if you comment out these lines: https://github.com/invertase/melos/blob/main/packages/melos/lib/src/commands/run.dart#L68-L71
you'll get an output with lots of these:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had a look at the failing tests of
run_tests.dart
and if I'm not mistaken 2 of the tests fail, because during test execution the running script isn't melos, but the test implementation.So
_determineMelosExecutablePaths()
resolves to something like/path/to/dart /path/to/test.dill
which fails of course.Unfortunately I no longer have spare time to work on this. :(
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, that makes sense... Hmm, I don't know what the best way to solve that would be. Maybe set an environment flag in the affected tests and look at that flag in
_determineMelosExecutablePaths()
and fall back to the old way if the flag is set?Do you think you will at some point in the future? Like within a month of two?