Added annotations, improved const correctness

[ariccio]

No description provided.

[ionescu007]

What do you think about using CONST instead of const?

[ariccio]

I could do that. Is there any reason for that? I'm guessing it has to do
with the kookyness of C? Or is it just like the "L" in "LPRECT" (just
vestigial)?

Sidenote: I had wanted to use last-level value const, but apparently that's
a C++ only thing. Surprising, but makes sense in retrospect.

On Sep 18, 2016 1:12 PM, "Alex Ionescu" [email protected] wrote:

@ionescu007 commented on this pull request.

What do you think about using CONST instead of const?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#12 (review),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACCwZNgIF6JfJmbIhvIfb-npxTYVShd_ks5qrXDxgaJpZM4J_hRS
.

[ariccio]

Ick, it got all messed up. I'll fix it tomorrow.