Add not-unlockable expiration UC condition

iotaledger · Nov 21, 2023 · ec91f9e · ec91f9e
1 parent 02f5d40
commit ec91f9e
Showing 1 changed file with 6 additions and 5 deletions.
diff --git a/tips/TIP-0038/tip-0038.md b/tips/TIP-0038/tip-0038.md
@@ -575,11 +575,12 @@ For the rationale behind the index choices for the slot index conditions in this
 The following table summarizes the outcome of the syntactic and semantic validation rules with respect to which address
 is allowed to unlock the output containing the <i>Expiration Unlock Condition</i>:
 
-| Slot Index Condition                       | Outcome                                       |
-| ------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------- |
-| `Slot Index` = `0`                         | Output and containing transaction is invalid. |
-| `Slot Index` > `Past Bounded Slot Index`   | Unlockable by `Address`.                      |
-| `Slot Index` ≤ `Future Bounded Slot Index` | Unlockable by `Return Address`.               |
+| Slot Index Condition                                                             | Outcome                                       |
+| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
+| `Slot Index = 0`                                                                 | Output and containing transaction is invalid. |
+| `Slot Index > Past Bounded Slot Index`                                           | Unlockable by `Address`.                      |
+| `Slot Index ≤ Future Bounded Slot Index`                                         | Unlockable by `Return Address`.               |
+| `Slot Index ≤ Past Bounded Slot Index && Slot Index > Future Bounded Slot Index` | Not unlockable.                               |
 
 <details>
   <summary>Expiration Unlock Condition</summary>