Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
* articles.bib (KorMosWal1990choice,KorWal1998paretorace,
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
   TamJonEld1995,XuYan2003ids): New.
 * authors.bib (Climaco_J): New.
 * biblio.bib (KorWall1997behavioral): New.
  • Loading branch information
@MLopez-Ibanez
MLopez-Ibanez committed Dec 11, 2023
1 parent 8f21e73 commit a51b539
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 154 additions and 4 deletions.
115 changes: 115 additions & 0 deletions articles.bib
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -9715,6 +9715,32 @@ @Article{Kor1985omega
pages = {569--574},
}

@Article{KorMosWal1990choice,
author = Korhonen #and# {Moskowitz, Herbert} #and# Wallenius_J,
title = {Choice Behavior in Interactive Multiple-Criteria Decision
Making},
journal = aor,
year = 1990,
volume = 23,
number = 1,
pages = {161--179},
month = dec,
doi = {10.1007/BF02204844},
abstract = {Choice behavior in an interactive multiple-criteria decision
making environment is examined experimentally. A ``free
search'' discrete visual interactive reference direction
approach was used on a microcomputer by management students
to solve two realistic and relevant multiple-criteria
decision problems. The results revealed persistent patterns
of intransitive choice behavior, and an unexpectedly rapid
degree of convergence of the reference direction approach on
a preferred solution. The results can be explained using
Tversky' additive utility difference model and
Kahneman-Tversky's prospect theory. The implications of the
results for the design of interactive multiple-criteria
decision procedures are discussed.}
}

@Article{KorPagFal2001,
title = {On the ``dimensionality curse'' and the ``self-similarity
blessing''},
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -9822,6 +9848,29 @@ @Article{KorStuExn2010jcim
pages = {1669--1681}
}

@Article{KorWal1998paretorace,
author = Korhonen_P #and# Wallenius_J,
title = {A pareto race},
journal = nrl,
year = 1988,
volume = 35,
number = 6,
pages = {615--623},
doi =
{10.1002/1520-6750(198812)35:6<615::AID-NAV3220350608>3.0.CO;2-K},
abstract = {A dynamic and visual ``free-search'' type of interactive
procedure for multiple-objective linear programming is
presented. The method enables a decision maker to freely
search any part of the efficient frontier by controlling the
speed and direction of motion. The objective function values
are represented in numeric form and as bar graphs on a
display. The method is implemented on an IBM PC/1
microcomputer and is illustrated using a multiple-objective
linear-programming model for managing disposal of sewage
sludge in the New York Bight. Some other applications are
also briefly discussed.}
}

@Article{Kot2014:aim,
author = Kotthoff_L,
title = {Algorithm Selection for Combinatorial Search Problems: {A} Survey},
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -16868,6 +16917,31 @@ @Article{Tam1992
publisher = taylorfrancis
}

@Article{TamJonEld1995,
author = {Tamiz, M. and Jones, D. F. and El-Darzi, E.},
title = {A review of {Goal} {Programming} and its applications},
journal = aor,
year = 1995,
volume = 58,
number = 1,
pages = {39--53},
month = jan,
doi = {10.1007/BF02032309},
abstract = {This paper presents a review of the current literature on the
branch of multi-criteria decision modelling known as Goal
Programming (GP). The result of our indepth investigations of
the two main GP methods, lexicographic and weighted GP
together with their distinct application areas is
reported. Some guidelines to the scope of GP as an
application tool are given and methods of determining which
problem areas are best suited to the different GP approaches
are proposed. The correlation between the method of assigning
weights and priorities and the standard of the results is
also ascertained.},
language = {en},
keywords = {Goal Programming, lexicographic, weighted}
}

@Article{TanAra2013,
author = {Shunji Tanaka and Mituhiko Araki},
title = {An Exact Algorithm for the Single-machine Total Weighted Tardiness
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -18307,6 +18381,46 @@ @Article{XuLuChe2013
pages = {271--287}
}

@Article{XuYan2003ids,
author = Xu_DL #and# Yang_JB,
title = {Intelligent Decision System for Self-Assessment},
journal = jmcda,
year = 2003,
volume = 12,
number = 1,
pages = {43--60},
doi = {10.1002/mcda.343},
abstract = {Many small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the UK use the
beta (Business Excellence Through Action) approach to the
EFQM Excellence Model to conduct business excellence
self-assessment, which is in essence a multiple criteria
decision analysis (MCDA) problem. This paper introduces a
decision support software package called Intelligent Decision
System (IDS) to implement the beta approach. It is
demonstrated in the paper that the IDS-beta package can
provide not only average scores but also the following
numerical results and graphical displays on: Distributed
assessment results to demonstrate the diversity of company
performances The performance range to cater for incomplete
assessment information Comparisons between current
performances and past performances, among different companies
among different action plans. Strengths and weaknesses The
IDS-beta package also provides a structured knowledge base to
help assessors to make judgements more objectively. The
knowledge base contains guidelines provided by the developers
of the beta approach, best practices gathered from research
on award winning organizations, evidence collected from
companies being assessed and comments provided by assessors
to record the reasons why a specific criterion is assessed to
a certain grade for a company. Four small UK companies, the
industry partners of the research project, have carried out
the preliminary self-assessment using the package. The
results and experience of the application are discussed at
the end of the paper.},
keywords = {decision support system, business excellence, MCDA, quality
award, self-assessment, the evidential reasoning approach}
}

@Article{YagKisIba2006,
author = Yagiura #and# {M. Kishida} #and# Ibaraki,
title = {A 3-Flip Neighborhood Local Search for the Set Covering Problem},
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -18698,3 +18812,4 @@ @Article{vanZyl04
pages = {160--170},
month = mar,
}

1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions authors.bib
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ @string{Cintrano
@string{Clark = " R. M. Clark "}
@string{Clerc_M = " Clerc, Maurice "}
@string{Climaco = " J. N. Cl{\'i}maco "}
@string{Climaco_J = " Jo{\~ao} Cl{\'i}maco "}
@string{Coello = " Carlos A. {Coello Coello} "}
@string{Cohen_G = " G. Cohen "}
@string{Cohn_H = " Harry Cohn "}
Expand Down
42 changes: 38 additions & 4 deletions biblio.bib
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -7106,6 +7106,36 @@ @InCollection{KorStuExn06
doi = {10.1007/11839088_22},
}

@InCollection{KorWall1997behavioral,
author = Korhonen_P #and# Wallenius_J,
title = {Behavioral Issues in {MCDM}: {Neglected} Research Questions},
booktitle = {Multicriteria Analysis},
publisher = springer,
year = 1997,
editor = Climaco_J,
pages = {412--422},
address = add-berlin-heidelberg,
isbn = {978-3-642-60667-0},
shorttitle = {Behavioral Issues in {MCDM}},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_39},
abstract = {Behavior decision theorists have studied human decision
making in great detail. Since the late 1960’s, Einhorn,
Edwards, Kahneman, Roy, Trevsky, and others have developed
new thoeries to explain choice and decision behavior. Thus
far this behavior research has had little impact on multiple
criteria decision making (MCDM). Only a handful of
MCDM-research have critically examined the behavioral
underpinnings of our field. To improve the success of
decision tools in practice, MCDM-research should pay more
attention to the behavioral realities of decision making. In
this paper, we discuss various behavioral issues relevent for
MCDM based on our personal observations and experiments with
human subjects. The spirit of our paper is to pose questions
rather than provide definite answers.},
language = {en},
keywords = {Aspiration Level, Decision Tool, Nondominated Solution,
Prefer Solution, Prospect Theory}
}
@InCollection{KosVerDoe2021,
author = {Kostovska, Ana} #and# Vermetten_D #and# Doerr_C #and#
{D\v{z}eroski, Sa\v{s}o} #and# {Panov, Pan\v{c}e} #and#
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -11924,11 +11954,14 @@ @InProceedings{Teo2010
organization = {IEEE},
publisher = ieeep,
}

@InCollection{TerRosVal99gecco,
author = {Hugo Terashima-Mar\'{i}n and Peter Ross and Manuel Valenzuela-Rend\'{o}n},
title = {Evolution of Constraint Satisfaction Strategies in Examination Timetabling},
crossref = {GECCO1999},
pages = {635--642}
author = {Hugo Terashima-Mar\'{i}n} #and# Ross_P #and# {Manuel
Valenzuela-Rend\'{o}n},
title = {Evolution of Constraint Satisfaction Strategies in
Examination Timetabling},
pages = {635--642},
crossref = {GECCO1999}
}

@InCollection{Thie2007adaptive,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -13199,3 +13232,4 @@ @PhDThesis{vanZyl:PhD
Exeter, UK},
year = 2001
}

0 comments on commit a51b539

Please sign in to comment.