Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(web): Service web contact form - Add custom fields for 'Vinnueftirlitið' #17202

Merged

Conversation

RunarVestmann
Copy link
Member

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann commented Dec 11, 2024

Service web contact form - Add custom fields for 'Vinnueftirlitið'

What

  • Custom fields for 'Vinnueftirlitið' service web contact form

Why

  • Requested by Digital Iceland

Screenshots / Gifs

Screen.Recording.2024-12-11.at.13.48.53.mov

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new input fields and a checkbox controller in the Standard Form.
    • Added a BasicCheckbox component for enhanced user interaction.
    • Expanded categorization functionality with new categories related to workplace inspections.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced validation logic for new fields to ensure proper submission.
  • Documentation

    • Updated type definitions to include new categories and input fields.

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Dec 11, 2024
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann requested review from a team as code owners December 11, 2024 13:49
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request enhance the StandardForm.tsx component by adding new input fields and a BasicCheckbox component for user interaction related to whistleblower protection. The form's state management and submission logic are updated to incorporate these new fields, along with enhanced validation. Additionally, the types.ts file is updated to include a new category type, VinnueftirlitidCategories, which expands the categorization functionality. A new enumeration for these categories is also introduced in the utils.ts file.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/web/components/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/StandardForm.tsx Added BasicCheckbox component, expanded labels object, updated state management, modified useEffect for new categories, and enhanced validation logic. Updated onSubmit method signature.
apps/web/components/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/types.ts Added VinnueftirlitidCategories type and updated CategoryId to include this new category.
apps/web/screens/ServiceWeb/Forms/utils.ts Introduced enum VinnueftirlitidCategories with 12 entries related to workplace inspections.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

deploy-feature

Suggested reviewers

  • mannipje

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apps/web/components/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/StandardForm.tsx (2)

187-189: Consider localizing the checkbox value instead of hardcoding 'Já'

Hardcoding 'Já' as the checkbox value may cause issues with internationalization if the application needs to support multiple locales in the future. It would be better to use a localized string or the label value to ensure proper localization.


526-648: Reduce code duplication in category-specific field rendering

The useEffect hook contains multiple switch cases where similar JSX code is repeated for different VinnueftirlitidCategories. To improve maintainability and readability, consider refactoring this code by extracting common elements into reusable components or helper functions.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7dce5d8 and f639cb6.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • apps/web/components/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/StandardForm.tsx (6 hunks)
  • apps/web/components/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • apps/web/screens/ServiceWeb/Forms/utils.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
apps/web/screens/ServiceWeb/Forms/utils.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/web/components/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/types.ts (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
apps/web/components/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/StandardForm.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
🔇 Additional comments (4)
apps/web/components/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/StandardForm.tsx (2)

29-32: New imports for added components and categories

The imports for CheckboxController, InputController, and VinnueftirlitidCategories are correctly added to support the new functionality.

Also applies to: 48-48


100-107: Labels added for new fields are appropriate

The labels for the new fields are correctly defined and maintain consistency with existing labels.

apps/web/components/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/types.ts (1)

4-4: Updated CategoryId to include VinnueftirlitidCategories

The CategoryId type correctly includes the new VinnueftirlitidCategories, and the import is properly added.

Also applies to: 11-11

apps/web/screens/ServiceWeb/Forms/utils.ts (1)

100-113: Added VinnueftirlitidCategories enum for new categories

The new VinnueftirlitidCategories enum is correctly defined with all required categories.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 35.75%. Comparing base (920eb26) to head (8bf5c6e).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...nts/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/StandardForm.tsx 0.00% 27 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17202      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.75%   35.75%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6935     6935              
  Lines      148076   148012      -64     
  Branches    42214    42180      -34     
==========================================
- Hits        52946    52923      -23     
+ Misses      95130    95089      -41     
Flag Coverage Δ
web 2.42% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
apps/web/screens/ServiceWeb/Forms/utils.ts 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...nts/ServiceWeb/Forms/StandardForm/StandardForm.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1e60763...8bf5c6e. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: feature/web-service-contact-form-fields-for-vinnueftirlitid
Commit report: 211d579
Test service: web

✅ 0 Failed, 84 Passed, 0 Skipped, 31.9s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

@thoreyjona thoreyjona added automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass and removed automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass labels Dec 12, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 2523e39 into main Dec 13, 2024
36 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the feature/web-service-contact-form-fields-for-vinnueftirlitid branch December 13, 2024 00:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants