Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(devops):Cache update #17230

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

chore(devops):Cache update #17230

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

robertaandersen
Copy link
Member

@robertaandersen robertaandersen commented Dec 13, 2024

...

Attach a link to issue if relevant

What

Specify what you're trying to achieve

Why

Specify why you need to achieve this

Screenshots / Gifs

Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated the dependency version for @actions/cache to the latest version.
    • Removed the previous patch resolution for @actions/cache.

@robertaandersen robertaandersen requested a review from a team as a code owner December 13, 2024 14:33
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the version of the @actions/cache dependency from 3.2.4 to 4.0.0 in the scripts/ci/cache/package.json file. It also removes the resolutions section that previously specified a patch for the older version. This change signifies a transition to utilizing the latest version of the dependency without the need for prior patches.

Changes

File Change Summary
scripts/ci/cache/package.json Updated @actions/cache dependency from 3.2.4 to 4.0.0 and removed the resolutions section.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: cache #15475: This PR addresses caching issues in the GitHub Actions workflow, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR regarding the update of the @actions/cache dependency.
  • fix: bug #15499: This PR involves modifications to caching mechanisms in the GitHub Actions setup, specifically in the context of cache directories, which aligns with the main PR's focus on updating the cache dependency.
  • chore(ci): Add more stuff to ignores v2 #17073: This PR discusses changes to the .dockerignore file that affect cache directories, which could relate to the caching improvements made in the main PR.

Suggested labels

automerge, test everything

Suggested reviewers

  • peturgq
  • busla

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 231b35f and 5571ab9.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • scripts/ci/cache/yarn.lock is excluded by !**/yarn.lock, !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • scripts/ci/cache/package.json (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • scripts/ci/cache/package.json

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@robertaandersen robertaandersen deleted the cache-update branch December 13, 2024 14:38
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 13, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.74%. Comparing base (c13fd91) to head (5571ab9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17230      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.74%   35.74%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6937     6937              
  Lines      148167   148171       +4     
  Branches    42250    42253       +3     
==========================================
- Hits        52969    52968       -1     
- Misses      95198    95203       +5     
Flag Coverage Δ
air-discount-scheme-backend 48.20% <ø> (ø)
air-discount-scheme-web 0.00% <ø> (ø)
api 3.33% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-air-discount-scheme 37.90% <ø> (ø)
api-domains-auth-admin 48.49% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 38.74% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
application-template-api-modules 27.81% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 22.51% <ø> (ø)
auth-admin-web 2.43% <ø> (ø)
auth-shared 75.00% <ø> (ø)
contentful-apps 4.72% <ø> (ø)
financial-aid-backend 51.40% <ø> (ø)
icelandic-names-registry-backend 54.33% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-api 20.16% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-backend 55.83% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-message-handler 48.23% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-scheduler 70.97% <ø> (ø)
judicial-system-web 27.88% <ø> (ø)
license-api 42.91% <ø> (-0.06%) ⬇️
services-auth-admin-api 52.55% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-delegation-api 58.53% <ø> (ø)
services-auth-ids-api 52.54% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
services-auth-public-api 49.40% <ø> (ø)
services-sessions 65.30% <ø> (-0.05%) ⬇️
services-university-gateway 49.51% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
services-user-notification 46.52% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
services-user-profile 56.94% <ø> (ø)
skilavottord-ws 24.31% <ø> (ø)
web 2.42% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c13fd91...5571ab9. Read the comment docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant