Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(income-plan): Remove edit function after submission #17246

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 16, 2024

Conversation

ylfahfa
Copy link
Member

@ylfahfa ylfahfa commented Dec 16, 2024

Remove edit functionality

What

Don't allow applicant to edit application after submission

Why

To simplify the process

Screenshots / Gifs

Remove this button and edit functionality
Screenshot 2024-12-16 at 10 56 13

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Simplified user interface by removing the "Edit" button from the income plan review process.
    • Updated messaging to reflect that the income plan is awaiting review.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined role capabilities for applicants in the submitted state, eliminating unnecessary editing actions.
  • Documentation

    • Updated message descriptors to clarify the editing status of the income plan during the review process.

@ylfahfa ylfahfa requested a review from a team as a code owner December 16, 2024 11:01
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the income plan module, specifically removing the ability for applicants to edit their income plan after submission to Tryggingastofnun. The modifications span across multiple files, including the Review component, IncomePlanTemplate, and messages.ts. The primary focus is on simplifying the user interface and state management by eliminating the edit functionality for applications in the TRYGGINGASTOFNUN_SUBMITTED state.

Changes

File Change Summary
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/fields/Review/index.tsx Removed "Edit" button for TRYGGINGASTOFNUN_SUBMITTED application state.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/lib/IncomePlanTemplate.ts Eliminated EDIT event action and state transition for applicant in TRYGGINGASTOFNUN_SUBMITTED state.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/lib/messages.ts Removed buttonEdit message descriptor and simplified tryggingastofnunSubmittedContent message.
libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/lib/IncomePlanTemplate.spec.ts Removed test case for transition from TRYGGINGASTOFNUN_SUBMITTED to DRAFT on edit event.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • thorkellmani

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7dd5c12 and 2347268.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/lib/IncomePlanTemplate.spec.ts (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • libs/application/templates/social-insurance-administration/income-plan/src/lib/IncomePlanTemplate.spec.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.73%. Comparing base (0c7df8f) to head (5915052).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #17246   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   35.73%   35.73%           
=======================================
  Files        6938     6938           
  Lines      148305   148305           
  Branches    42316    42316           
=======================================
  Hits        52999    52999           
  Misses      95306    95306           
Flag Coverage Δ
api 3.33% <ø> (ø)
application-system-api 38.75% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
application-template-api-modules 27.80% <ø> (-0.03%) ⬇️
application-ui-shell 22.45% <ø> (ø)
web 2.41% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...stration/income-plan/src/lib/IncomePlanTemplate.ts 14.85% <ø> (ø)
...nce-administration/income-plan/src/lib/messages.ts 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 0c7df8f...5915052. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Dec 16, 2024

Datadog Report

All test runs 9fbe3ae 🔗

5 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 5 Passed
⬆️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 increased (+0.11%), 8 no change

Test Services
Service Name Failed Known Flaky New Flaky Passed Skipped Total Time Code Coverage Change Test Service View
api 0 0 0 4 0 2.97s 1 no change Link
application-system-api 0 0 0 46 0 2m 25.93s 1 no change Link
application-template-api-modules 0 0 0 118 0 2m 22.77s 1 no change Link
application-ui-shell 0 0 0 74 0 32.11s 1 no change Link
web 0 0 0 84 0 31.8s 1 no change Link

Copy link
Member

@helgifr helgifr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@ylfahfa ylfahfa added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Dec 16, 2024
@ylfahfa ylfahfa added automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass and removed automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass labels Dec 16, 2024
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 65767dc into main Dec 16, 2024
43 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the feat/ip-remove-edit-functionality branch December 16, 2024 14:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants