-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(j-s): remove the option to set a reviewer when a decision has been taken #17299
chore(j-s): remove the option to set a reviewer when a decision has been taken #17299
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Overview component for indictments in the judicial system web application. The key change is introducing a conditional rendering mechanism for the reviewer selection section. Now, the section will only be displayed when Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Neato 🙌
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (3)
124-124
: Improve type safety and clarity of the conditional checkConsider making the condition more explicit and type-safe:
-{!workingCase.indictmentReviewDecision && ( +{!workingCase?.indictmentReviewDecision && (Also consider adding a comment explaining what constitutes a "decision" for better maintainability.
148-157
: Simplify the Select value prop logicThe nested ternary expression can be simplified for better readability:
-value={ - selectedIndictmentReviewer - ? selectedIndictmentReviewer - : workingCase.indictmentReviewer - ? { - label: workingCase.indictmentReviewer.name || '', - value: workingCase.indictmentReviewer.id, - } - : undefined -} +value={ + selectedIndictmentReviewer ?? + (workingCase.indictmentReviewer && { + label: workingCase.indictmentReviewer.name || '', + value: workingCase.indictmentReviewer.id, + }) +}
Line range hint
184-189
: Extract complex disable condition into a variableConsider extracting the next button disable logic into a descriptive variable for better maintainability:
+const isNextButtonDisabled = + !selectedIndictmentReviewer || + selectedIndictmentReviewer.value === workingCase.indictmentReviewer?.id || + isLoadingWorkingCase; <FormFooter nextButtonIcon="arrowForward" previousUrl={constants.CASES_ROUTE} nextIsLoading={isLoadingWorkingCase} - nextIsDisabled={ - !selectedIndictmentReviewer || - selectedIndictmentReviewer.value === - workingCase.indictmentReviewer?.id || - isLoadingWorkingCase - } + nextIsDisabled={isNextButtonDisabled} onNextButtonClick={assignReviewer} nextButtonText={fm(core.continue)} />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx
(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
Pattern apps/**/*
: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:
- NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
- Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
- Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."
📓 Learnings (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (4)
Learnt from: oddsson
PR: island-is/island.is#16731
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Shared/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:172-186
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:20.157Z
Learning: In `IndictmentOverview.tsx`, since the defendants data does not change, using `useMemo` to memoize the filtering logic is unnecessary.
Learnt from: thorhildurt
PR: island-is/island.is#17198
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prison/IndictmentOverview/IndictmentOverview.tsx:42-50
Timestamp: 2024-12-11T14:25:44.741Z
Learning: In `IndictmentOverview.tsx`, when updating the punishment type, update the UI state before making the API call to immediately reflect the change.
Learnt from: gudjong
PR: island-is/island.is#16863
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Prosecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx:194-200
Timestamp: 2024-11-27T14:34:38.028Z
Learning: In `Overview.tsx`, the `defendant.subpoenas` array never contains null or undefined `subpoena` objects, so additional null checks are not needed.
Learnt from: unakb
PR: island-is/island.is#15378
File: apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/Court/Indictments/Summary/Summary.tsx:86-100
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T15:15:11.835Z
Learning: User unakb prefers explicit case handling in switch statements for key functionalities like `getRulingDecisionTagColor` to ensure clarity and avoid assumptions that a case was overlooked.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/judicial-system/web/src/routes/PublicProsecutor/Indictments/Overview/Overview.tsx (1)
124-167
: Implementation successfully prevents reviewer assignment after decision
The changes effectively implement the requirement to prevent reviewer assignment after a decision has been made. The code is well-structured and maintains the existing functionality while adding the new restriction.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #17299 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 35.70% 35.70% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 6923 6923
Lines 148597 148599 +2
Branches 42450 42452 +2
==========================================
Hits 53058 53058
- Misses 95539 95541 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
|
Datadog ReportAll test runs ✅ 9 Total Test Services: 0 Failed, 9 Passed Test Services
|
What
Why
Screenshots / Gifs
Attach Screenshots / Gifs to help reviewers understand the scope of the pull request
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes