Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(web): Organizations page - truncate tag label #17349

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

RunarVestmann
Copy link
Member

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann commented Dec 23, 2024

Organizations page - truncate tag label

Screenshots / Gifs

Before

Screenshot 2024-12-23 at 10 53 56

After

Screenshot 2024-12-23 at 10 54 20

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Formatting passes locally with my changes
  • I have rebased against main before asking for a review

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added text truncation for tags in the CategoryCard component, improving the display of tags on the Organization Page.

@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann added the automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass label Dec 23, 2024
@RunarVestmann RunarVestmann requested review from a team as code owners December 23, 2024 10:54
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a minor modification to the CategoryCard component within the OrganizationPage in the web application. Specifically, a new property truncate: true is added to the tagOptions object, which will enable text truncation for tags. This change aims to improve the visual presentation of tags by limiting their length when displayed in the user interface.

Changes

File Change Summary
apps/web/screens/Organizations/Organizations.tsx Added truncate: true to tagOptions for CategoryCard

Suggested labels

deploy-feature

Suggested reviewers

  • mannipje

Possibly related PRs


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 35.68%. Comparing base (be57698) to head (7089496).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #17349      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   35.68%   35.68%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        6931     6929       -2     
  Lines      148792   148708      -84     
  Branches    42511    42488      -23     
==========================================
- Hits        53098    53061      -37     
+ Misses      95694    95647      -47     
Flag Coverage Δ
web 2.40% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
apps/web/screens/Organizations/Organizations.tsx 0.00% <ø> (ø)

... and 19 files with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update be57698...7089496. Read the comment docs.

@datadog-island-is
Copy link

datadog-island-is bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Datadog Report

Branch report: fix/web-organization-tag-truncate
Commit report: 0d7f000
Test service: web

✅ 0 Failed, 84 Passed, 0 Skipped, 24.62s Total Time
➡️ Test Sessions change in coverage: 1 no change

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/web/screens/Organizations/Organizations.tsx (1)

276-276: Consider adding tooltip or alternative indication for truncated text.
By enabling the "truncate: true" option, the text will be shortened when it exceeds a certain length, which is beneficial for UI layout. However, be aware that important information may become inaccessible. Consider providing a tooltip, an ellipsis, or a "read more" link to ensure users can view the full text if needed.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e0a1eec and 396841a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apps/web/screens/Organizations/Organizations.tsx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
apps/web/screens/Organizations/Organizations.tsx (1)

Pattern apps/**/*: "Confirm that the code adheres to the following:

  • NextJS best practices, including file structure, API routes, and static generation methods.
  • Efficient state management and server-side rendering techniques.
  • Optimal use of TypeScript for component and utility type safety."

@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot merged commit 07cbc1d into main Jan 3, 2025
34 checks passed
@kodiakhq kodiakhq bot deleted the fix/web-organization-tag-truncate branch January 3, 2025 10:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
automerge Merge this PR as soon as all checks pass
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants